Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2008 DIGILAW 1629 (MAD)

K. Ponnurangam v. The State of TamilNadu rep. by The Director of Employment & Another

2008-06-10

M.JAICHANDREN

body2008
Judgment :- By consent of the learned counsels on either side, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. Heard the learned counsels appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 3. Though the prayer is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the appeal, dated 24. 1994, filed by the petitioner, is directed to be disposed of by the first respondent, within a specified period. 4. The learned Government Advocate has no objection for this Court passing such an order. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned, without going into the merits of the case, the first respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the appeal, dated 24. 1994, filed by the petitioner, after giving sufficient opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if it has not been disposed of till date. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the appeal, dated 24. 1994, to the first respondent, along with a copy of this order. 6. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.