Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2008 DIGILAW 1634 (MAD)

M. Ananda Parasuramman v. The Director General of Police & Another

2008-06-10

M.JAICHANDREN

body2008
Judgment :- By consent of the learned counsels on either side, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. Heard the learned counsels appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 3. Though the prayer is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 211. 1995, is directed to be disposed of by the first respondent, within a specified period. 4. The learned Government Advocate has no objection for this Court passing such an order. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned, without going into the merits of the case, the first respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 211. 1995, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if it has not been disposed of till date. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 211. 1995, to the first respondent, along with a copy of this order. 6. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.