Judgment :- Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks to set aside the order dated 09. 1997 issued by the second respondent and for a consequential direction to the second respondent to continue the petitioner in employment till such time he is absorbed in any other Corporation in suitable post commensurate with his qualification. 3. The petitioner was employed in the second respondent Corporation, which is a subsidiary of Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. which is wholly owned by the State Government. The State Government issued G.O. Ms. No. 59 Industries Department dated 20.02.1997 directing that the workers who were laid off by the second respondent due to want of work, should be absorbed in other Public Sector Undertaking including State Transport Corporations till such time the State Transport Corporations are precluded from recruiting candidates from outside. 4. The petitioner, who was working as an Operator Grade III, has the qualification of S.S.L.C. and his name was sent for absorption to various Corporations. Initially they took the stand that he was discharged from service and therefore, he was ineligible for any employment. Subsequently, he was forced to accept the post of Helper that too, on a casual basis and without his consent, though his juniors were absorbed in regular vacancies and they were all given posts commensurate to their qualification. Even when the second respondent had filed an application for retrenchment in terms of Section 25N of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [for short, I.D. Act], the same was not granted. Therefore, in the absence of any prior permission of the Government, the petitioner cannot be denied employment commensurate with his position. 5. A counter affidavit has been filed by the second respondent stating that once the petitioner had already joined the services of the third respondent, he cannot get any higher post and he cannot also compare himself with that of one Ravichandran, who had filed a writ petition being W.P. No. 1142 of 1997. 6. The point of distinction was that the petitioner had joined the services of the third respondent and had received all the terminal benefits on 09.01.1998. 6. The point of distinction was that the petitioner had joined the services of the third respondent and had received all the terminal benefits on 09.01.1998. But nowhere in the proceedings, there is any mention that the petitioner had agreed to work as a Helper with the third respondent whereas the Government Order directs the Corporation to absorb them in commensurate to their qualification. 7. In identical circumstances, this Court in W.P. No. 10454 of 1988 (P.R. Raveendran vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and others), disposed on 13. 2002, has passed the following order:- Para 6: "Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that even though the petitioner is a graduate, he has not been given suitable post and he has been offered only the post of Helper. However, the learned counsel for the third respondent submitted that there is no equivalent post of chemist in the third respondent corporation and for want of any clerical post to which the petitioner is qualified, he has been offered the post of Helper. Para 7: It is true that the petitioner, who is a graduate has to be accommodated in a suitable post. However, in the absence of any suitable post, this Court cannot direct the third respondent to appoint the petitioner in a suitable post, even though the petitioner is entitled to the post other than the one of Helper. However, in terms of the Government Order, the petitioner is entitled to be considered for the post for which he is suitable and eligible. In that event, it is for the first respondent to consider the grievance of the petitioner for issuing suitable directions to any other Corporations or any other undertakings to appoint the petitioner in a suitable post. Therefore, the first respondent is at liberty to consider the grievance of the petitioner and explore the possibility of accommodating the petitioner in any one of the suitable posts under its control and issue appropriate directions, so as to enable the petitioner being accommodated in a suitable post. However, it is made clear that in the absence of any details of vacancy in any other corporations and undertakings under the control of the Government, in respect of post to which the petitioner is eligible, the above directions shall not be considered as directions issued positively in favour of the petitioner. However, it is made clear that in the absence of any details of vacancy in any other corporations and undertakings under the control of the Government, in respect of post to which the petitioner is eligible, the above directions shall not be considered as directions issued positively in favour of the petitioner. The consideration by the first respondent is always depending upon the availability of the post if any in the corporation undertakings, under its control." 8. In the light of the same, the writ petition will stand allowed. The respondents are directed to offer the petitioner the post commensurate with his qualification and provide all benefits arising out of the same. This exercise shall be done within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.