Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2008 DIGILAW 1749 (RAJ)

Shyam Sunder v. Vijay

2008-07-22

KAMAL NAYAN SHRIMAL

body2008
Jheky] lnL;-&;g fuxjkuh jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼ftls rRipkr~ la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 230 ds vUrxZr jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] t;iqj ds fu.kZ; fnukad 29-10-98 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gSa fd oknh ;ke lqUnj o jkepUnz us izfroknh jktLFkku ljdkj tfj;s rglhynkj] dksViqryh dks i{kdkj cukrs gq, jktLo okn la- 245@93 gd dh ?kks"k.kk ds laca/k esa d`f"k Hkwfe [kljk ua- 316 jdck 1 ch?kk 1 fcLok xzke gluiqjk rglhy dksViqryh ds laca/k esa isk dj dgk fd mDr Hkwfe dk bUnzkt jktLo vfHkys[kksa esa ukFkw iq= jken;ky ds uke gks jgk gSA ukFkwjke dh e`R;q gks xbZ gS vkSj oknhx.k mlds okfjl gS] vr% e`rd ukFkwjke ds LFkku ij oknhx.k dks [kkrsnkj dkrdkj ?kksf"kr fd;k tkosaA lEeu rkehy ds ipkr~ izfroknh ds mifLFkr u gksus ij muds fo:) ,drjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ xbZA oknhx.k us nLrkostksa lk{; ds vfrfjDr xokg ;kelqUnj o dSykkpan ds c;ku djok;sA fopkj.k U;k;ky; us muds fu.kZ; fnukad 16-2-94 }kjk oknhx.k dk okn fMØh dj fn;kA fnukad 12-7-94 dks fot;] fouksn] v:.k] lat; lHkh iq=ku gsrjke eq- eSuk iRuh gsrjke izkFkhZx.k us fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 16-2-94 ds fo:) utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= la- 9@95 mi[k.M vf/kdkjh dksViqryh ds U;k;ky; esa isk dj dgk gS fd dke ds flyflys esa muds nknk fxjMh ¼fcgkj½ esa jgrs gSA oknhx.k dks vkjkth dks ns[kjs[k ds fy, NksM+ j[kk FkkA e`rd ukFkwjke ds nks iq= gsrjke o gjhjke gq,A gjhjke dh e`R;q gks xbZA oknhx.k dk e`rd ukFkwjke ls dksbZ lca/k ugha gSA fu.kZ; fnukad 16-2-94 izkFkhZx.k dks lqus fcuk ikfjr fd;k gS] vr% mls fujLr fd;k tk,A i{kdkjksa dks lquus ds ipkr~ mi[k.M vf/kdkjh us muds vknsk fnukad 19-6-95 }kjk izkFkhZx.k fot; o vU; dk utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj fy;kA mDr vknsk ls O;fFkr gksdj oknhx.k us jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] t;iqj ds le{k vihy la- 74@95 izLrqr dh] ftls mUgksaus muds fu.kZ; fnukad 26-4-96 }kjk vkafkd :i ls Lohdkj dj vknsk fnukad 19-6-95 dks fujLr dj fn;k rFkk mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] dksViqryh dks funsZk fn, fd os nksuksa i{kksa dks lquokbZ dk iw.kZ volj nsrs gq, xq.kkxq.k ij iqu% fu.kZ; djsaA izdj.k izkIr gksus ij mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] dksViqryh us mls eqdnek ua- 36@97 ij ntZ jftLVj fd;k rFkk i{kdkjksa dks lquus ds ipkr~ muds vknsk fnukad 23-9-97 }kjk izkFkhZx.k dk utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= 200@& :- dh dkWLV ij Lohdkj fd;kA mDr vknsk ls O;fFkr gksdj oknhx.k us jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] t;iqj ds le{k vihy izLrqr dh] ftls mUgksaus muds fu.kZ; fnukad 29-10-98 }kjk fujLr dj nhA mDr fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj fuxjkdkj@oknhx.k us izuxr fuxjkuh jktLo e.My jktLFkku] vtesj esa izLrqr dhA 3- i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k dks lquk x;kA 4- fuxjkdkj ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dh eq[; nyhy gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds fu.kZ; fof/k&fo/kku ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k rF;ksa ds izfrdwy gksus ds dkj.k fujLruh; gSA okn fnukad 16-2-94 dks fMØh fd;k x;k] ftlds fo:) xSj fuxjkdkj us fuxjkuh izzLrqr dh] tks iks"k.kh; ugha Fkh] ftls mi[k.M vf/kdkjh us Lohdkj dj yhA fuxjkuh jktLo e.My esa gh isk gksrh gSA fuxjkdkjku us mlds fo:) jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh ds U;k;ky; esa vihy izLrqr dh] ftls mUgksaus muds vknsk fnukad 26-4-96 }kjk Lohdkj dj izdj.k dks iqu% fuLrkj.k ds fy, izfrizsf"kr dj fn;kA mi[k.M vf/kdkjh ds ;gka fuxjkdkjku us izkjfEHkd vkifRr;ka izLrqr dh vkSj utjlkuh ds xq.kkxq.k ij dksbZ cgl ugha dh ijUrq mi[k.M vf/kdkjh us utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj fy;k tks ljklj xyr ,oa voS/kkfud gSA cgl dsoy izkjfEHkd vkifRr;ka ds laca/k esa lquh xbZ FkhA xSj fuxjkdkj e`rd ukFkwyky ds okfjl gS] bl laca/k esa mUgksaus dksbZ lk{; izLrqr ugha dhA v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa us vknsk 47 fu;e 1 o 2 lhihlh o jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 dh /kkjk 229 ds izko/kkuksa ds utj vankt dj fu.kZ; ikfjr fd, gS] tks fujLr ;ksX; gSA 5- xSj fuxjkdkj ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dh nyhy gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds fu.kZ; fof/k ds izko/kkuksa ds vuq:i gSA jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] t;iqj us fuxjkdkjku }kjk izLrqr lHkh vkifRr;ksa ij eUrO; dj viuk fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gS] vr% fuxjkdkjku dk ;g dguk fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds fu.kZ; izkd`frd U;k; ds fl)kUrksa ds foijhr gS] ekuus ;ksX; ugha gSA fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 16-2-94 ds fo:) xSj fuxjkdkj us utj lkuh izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k Fkk u fd fuxjkuhA lgcu ls iquokZyksdu dh txg iquZfujh{k.k vkosnu i= fy[kk x;k] ftlds lakks/ku ds fy, xSj fuxjkdkj la[;k 1 ls 5 us ,d izkFkZuk i= fnukad 19-4-1995 dks mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] dksViqryh ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dj fn;k FkkA vr% fuxjkdkjku dh fuxjkuh fujLr dh tkosaA 6- eSaus i{kdkjku ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa dh nyhyksa ij euu fd;kA 7- xSj fuxjkdkj utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= esa e`rd ukFkwjke ds fof/kd izfrfuf/k dgdj vk jgs gSA fof/kd izfrfuf/k ds dkj.k e`rd ukFkwjke dh vkjkth esa mudk fgr fufgr gSA bl dkj.k mUgsa utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= isk djus dk iw.kZ vf/kdkj gSA bl laca/k es eSa Savithramma vs. H. Gurappa Reddy and others ,vkbZvkj 1996 dukZVd 99 esa ekuuh; dukZVd mPPk U;k;ky; }kjk fn, fu.kZ; ds iSjk 12 dks m)jr djuk mfpr le>rk gwa] tks bl izdkj gS%& "On behalf of the respt. Gurappa Reddy, one other objection was canvassed which was to some extent submitted by the other learned advocate who represented the other respt. This was to the effect that the present applicant was not a party to the original proceedings and therefore cannot seek a review. The submission basically proceeds on the footing that a review is necessarily confined to the parties to the original proceeding and that it is not open to a "stranger" to the proceeding to seek a review. Under normal circumstances, I would have straight way upheld this objection because it is well settled law that however much a third party may be interested or effected by a litigation, that such, intervention would not be permissible by way of a review petition at a post decisional stage. However, in this instance the position that emerged in slightly different. What is contended by the applicants learned advocate is that she was one of the necessary parties and ought to have been one of the parties before the Court and that, the order affects her and therefore, application is not merely technical or academic. To this extent, a distinction will have to be drawn, though a very subtle one, on the unusual facts of the present case whereunder, the applicant cannot be categorised as an absolute stranger having regard to the complexion of the matter Under these circumstances to my mind, the objection whichwould have otherwise been upheld cannot be treated as a bar to the present review petition." 8- ekuuh; dukZVd mPp U;k;ky; us ,vkbZvkj 1981 dukZVd 35 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& "(B) Civil P.C., O. 9, R. 13, O. 47, S. 96 - Ex. parte decree- Remedies available to dependent - can either make application under O.9, R. 13 for setting aside ex parte decree or application under O. 47 for review or file an appeal under S. 96 - Scope of remedy under O. 9, R. 13 is wider." ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us dsljh flag cuke Jh ,e-,y- esgrk o vU; 1996¼1½ vkj,yMCY;w 141 esa jketkueflag cuke LVsV vkWQ ;wih o vU; ts-Vh- 1994 ¼4½ ,l-lh- 187 dk lgkjk ysrs gq, dgk gS fd%& "A person who was not impleaded in writ petition can either file a review application or can file S.L.P. before the Apex Court, in case his rights were affected by the judgment of the High Court." mi;qDr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa o orZeku izdj.k ds rF;ksa ds lanHkZ esa esjh lqfopkfjr jk; esa fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 16-2-94 ds fOk:) utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= iks"k.kh; ekudj v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa us dksbZ =qfV ugha dhA v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa us i{kdkjksa dks lqudj fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gS] bl dkj.k fu.kZ;ksa esa izFke n`"V;k dksbZ vf/kdkfjrk laca/kh =qfV ugha gSA okLrfodrkvksa dks tkuus ds fy, U;k;ky;ksa us izdj.k dks iqu% fuLrkfjr fd;s tkus ds fy, izfrizsf"kr fd;k gSA voj U;k;ky; us lHkh i=kofy;ksa ij Hkayh Hkkafr fopkj djus ds mijkUr viuk vknsk ikfjr fd;k gSA muds vknsk esa fdlh izdkj dh rF;kRed] fof/kd vFkok {ks=kf/kdkj laca/kh =qfV ugha gSA mudk vknsk iw.kZr% fof/k lEer gS ,oa cgky j[ks tkus ;ksX; gSA 9- mijksDr foospuk ds vk/kkj ij fuxjkuh fujLr dh tkrh gSA voj U;k;ky;ksa ds vfHkys[k okil fd;s tkosaA ;g i=koyh nkf[ky nrj gksaA lacaf/kr fyfid dks funsZk fn;s tkrs gS fd og bl fu.kZ; dh lwpuk i{kdkjksa ds vf/koDrkx.k dks tfj, lk/kkj.k Mkd HkstsA 10- fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA