JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record made available to me during the course of arguments of the case. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main allegations exist against Deependra Singh and Vikram Singh, who had collected the money from the students and otherwise the said money was not transferred to Kashmir University for registration of their candidature for B.Ed. Course. It is stated that the petitioner was the authorised person who registered the students for Kashmir University, but the complainant never came to him, but met with Deependra and Vikram Singh and even money was given to them, thus, looking to the aforesaid, the petitioner should be enlarged on bail, it is also contended that in 2 other matters, though bail applications were rejected by the lower Court, but the High Court had accepted the bail applications vide order dated 24.7.2008 and 9.7.2008 at Jodhpur. 3. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 4. After considering, the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing my opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I am of the view that the petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. This bail application is accordingly accepted. Therefore, the accused-petitioner, namely, Shanker Singh S/o Mahavir Singh, may be released on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in F.I.R. No. 236/2008 registered at Police Station Kotwali, Sikar for offence under Sections 420, 406 I.P.C. provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.Bail application allowed. *******