Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2008 DIGILAW 2035 (MAD)

A. Dhanasekaran v. The State of Tamilnadu, rep. by Secretary to Government & Others

2008-06-27

M.JAICHANDREN

body2008
Judgment :- Today, when this writ petition was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that the writ petition had become infructuous. 2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.