JUDGMENT 1. - Mr. S.K. Vyas, learned Public Prosecutor is directed to accept notice on behalf of the State. He accepts the notice. 2. The petitioner has moved this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.PC. against the orders dated 6.1.2004 and 19.4.2007 passed by the judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Khajuwala Distt. Bikaner whereby when the petitioner failed to appear before the Court on the date fixed, his bailbonds were forfeited and proceedings under Section 446 Cr.PC. were initiated. Later on, on 19.4.2007 when the presence of the accused-petitioner could not be procured, he was declared absconder and proceedings under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.PC. were initiated. 3. The case is listed at admission stage and notice was issued to the learned Public Prosecutor. 4. Both parties have agreed to decide the case finally at admission stage. 5. The question of illegality of order dated 6.1.2004 is concerned, it is found that there is neither any illegality nor any irregularity in the order. The accused-petitioner when failed to appear on the date fixed for, the Court forfeited his bailbonds and proceedings under Section 446 Cr.PC. were initiated and he was summoned by arrest warrant. There is neither any illegality in the order passed nor any irregularity, the order dated 6.1.2004 is perfectly legal. 6. The order dated 19.4.2007 is not sustainable in law because no proceedings under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.PC. were initiated before declaring the accused-petitioner as an absconder. It was mandatory for the Court to have followed the procedure mentioned in Sections 82 and 83 Cr.PC. before declaring the petitioner as absconder. After completion of the said proceedings, the accused-petitioner should have been declared as a absconder. 7. The Court while declaring the accused-petitioner as absconder has not followed due procedure as provided in the statute, the order so passed cannot be sustained. The nature of offence against the accused-petitioner is under Section 323 and 341 IPC. 8. Consequently, the order dated 19.4.2007 is quashed and set aside and the order dated 6.1.2004 is modified to the extent that the accused-petitioner instead of arrest warrant be summoned through bailable warrant of Rs. 10,000/-.Petition Allowed - Impugned Order Quashed. *******