JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public i Prosecutor and perused the record of the case. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the matter otherwise the prosecutrix married with the petitioner and certificate to that effect also exists and in this regard, f statement of the prosecutrix was also recorded under Section 161 Cr.PC. before the A.D.M. City wherein she has categorically stated that the petitioner married to the prosecutrix and they remained at Jaipur for some days together though in the statement so recorded under Section 164 Cr.PC., the prosecutrix has not denied the fact of marriage though with t some modification, it was said that it was commenced under force. It is stated that the FIR was lodged mainly for the reason that the petitioner is scheduled tribe by caste whereas the prosecutrix is said to be of upper caste. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 4. After considering the rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that the petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail and accordingly, the bail application is accepted and I consider it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner namely, Dinesh Chauhan s/o Late Dilbhar Singh on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. In FIR No. 169/08 registered at Police Station Bhimganjmandi, Kota for furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.Bail application allowed. *******