Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2008 DIGILAW 2273 (MAD)

R. Bakthavathasalam v. The Tamil Nadu Government rep. by its Secretary Department of Education, Fort St. George & Others

2008-07-07

M.JAICHANDREN

body2008
Judgment :- 1. Heard the learned counsels appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 2. Though the prayer is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the second respondent with regard to the reliefs sought for in the writ petition. 3. The learned Government Advocate has no objection for this Court passing such an order. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the second respondent with regard to the reliefs sought for in the writ petition, within a period of four weeks from today, and on such representation being submitted, the second respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks thereafter. 5. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.