JUDGMENT 1. - Learned Addl. JUDGMENT 1. - Learned Addl. District Judge No.1, Bikaner by the judgment dated 12.1.2007 while partially accepting the appeal preferred by the appellant to challenge the judgment and decree dated 24.5.2005 ordered as follows: " 18- vihykFkhZuh }kjk izLrqr vihy vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj dh tk dj fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk fu.kZ; o fMdzh fnukafdr 24-05-05 vikLr fd;k tkrk gSA 19- vihykFkhZuh@izkFkhZuh@izfrokfnuh }kjk izLrqr izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr vkns'k 41 fu;e 27 lh0ih0lh0 fnukafdr 04-07-05 ,rn}kjk ,d gtkj :i;s gtsZ ij Lohdkj fd;k tk dj fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dks funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gS fd mDr izkFkZuk i= dh gn rd fof/k vuqlkj lk{; ys[kc) djsaA 20- vihykFkhZuh@izfrokfnuh@izkFkhZuh }kjk izLrqr izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr vkns'k 41 fu;e 27 lh0ih0lh0 fnukafdr 20-3-06 ,rn~}kjk ,d gtkjk :i;s [kpsZ ij Lohdkj fd;k tk dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; mDr izkFkZuk i= dh gn rd vfrfjDr lk{; fof/k vuqlkj ys[kc) djsaA 21- fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukafdr 02-06-04 ,rn~}kjk vikLr fd;k tk dj izkFkhZuh&izfrokfnuh }kjk izLrqr fd;k x;k izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr vkns'k 6 fu;e 17 lh0ih0lh0 Lohdkj fd;k tk dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd mDr izkFkZuk i= fnukafdr 20-04-04 ds vuqlkj tokcnkok la'kksf/kr dj izLrqr djsa] izR;FkhZx.k dks mDr la'kks/ku dh gn rd tokcnkos dk tokcwytokc izLrqr djus dk vf/kdkj gksxkA 22- izkFkhZuh@vihykFkhZuh }kjk izLrqr izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr vkns'k 6 fu;e 17 lh0ih0lh0 fnukafdr 24-05-06 ,rn~}kjk Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd vihykFkhZuh@izfroknh@izkFkhZuh mDr izkFkZuk i= esa vafdrkuqlkj la'kksf/kr tokcnkok izLrqr djsa vkSj mijksDruqlkj la'kksf/kr tokcnkok dk mDr la'kks/ku dh gn rd tokcwytokc izLrqr djus dk izR;FkhZx.k@oknhx.k dks v/khdkj gksxkA 23- fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk nksuksa i{kksa dh lgefr ls ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 30-10-02 ftlds }kjk oknh dk izkFkZuk i= fnukafdr 22-10-02 Lohdkj fd;k tkdj oknh }kjk izLrqr la'kksf/kr okn fjdkMZ ij fy;k x;k] ,rn~}kjk vikLr fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ewy okn tks paikyky us izLrqr fd;k Fkk T;ksa dk R;ksa i=koyh ij ewy okn ds :i esa ekStwn jgsxk ftldk 'kh"kZd fnukad 20-08-97 dks izLrqr fd;s x;s la'kksf/kr 'kh"kZd ds vuqlkj gksxkA 24- vkns'k 41 fu;e 23 ( d ) lh0ih0lh0 ds vUrxZr izdj.k fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dks izfriszf"kr dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns'k ls vknsf'kr vfrfjDr lk{; ys[kc) djs] vknsf'kr la'kks/ku] rRlEcU/kh tokcwytokc dks fjdkMZ ij ys dj nksuksa i{kksa dks la'kksf/kr vfHkopu dh gn rd leFkZu esa vkSj ;FkkfLFkfr [k.Mu esa lk{; izLrqr djus dk ;Fkksfpr volj iznku djs vkSj lHkh fook|dksa ij fof/k vuqlkj fu.kZ; ikfjr djsA vkns'k 41 fu;e 26 ( d ) lh0ih0lh0 ds vUrxZr fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds le{k i{kdkjksa ds mifLFkr gksus ds fy;s fnukad 02-03-07 r; dh tkrh gSA " 2. Learned Addl. District Judge set aside the judgment and decree dated 24.5.2005 and remanded the matter to the trial court in the terms referred above. The contention of learned counsel for the appellant is that the appellate court, instead of remanding the matter, should have decided the matter on merits. 3. I have considered the arguments advanced and examined the judgment impugned. Learned appellate court by the judgment impugned accepted the application preferred under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC dated 4.7.2005, the application under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC dated 20.3.2006, the application dated 20.4.2004 preferred under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, the application dated 24.5.2006 preferred under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC and also permitted to the plaintiff to submit the rejoinder to the extent permission was granted to the defendant to amend the written statement. As a consequent to the acceptance of the application referred above matter certainly requires adjudication by the trial court, and therefore, no error has been committed by the appellate court in remanding the matter to the trial court while setting aside the judgment and decree. Thus, I do not find any merit in this appeal and the same therefore is rejected.Appeal Dismissed. *******