Judgment :- These are appeals are at the instance of the assessee against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras A Bench, dated 30.4.2008 passed in ITA.Nos.288/Mds/2006, 1052/Mds/2007 and 2314/Mds/2006 by formulating the following common question of law: "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income Tax Appellate tribunal was right in law in holding that the appellant was not entitled to deduction under Section 80IB of Income-tax Act 1961 on the ground that conversion of jumbo rolls into salable packets/ rolls of standard sizes was not manufacture or production of article or thing?" 2. The relevant assessment years are 2002-2003, 2004-2005 and 2003-2004. The facts, as culled out from the statement of facts are as follows: The assessee is a Company in which the public are not substantially interested. It engaged in the business of conversion of jumbo rolls of Konica colour paper, Konika graphic art film and medical X-ray films into commercially saleable packets/rolls of standard arise. Along with the returns of income filed by the appellant before the assessing officer in the relevant assessment years, the elaborate activity of conversion of jumbo rolls into salable packets, rolls of standard size was narrated in the note to drive home the point that such conversion involved manufacture or production of articles or things. The assessing officer disallowed the claim of deduction on the ground that there was no manufacture of article or thing and relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Relish Foods (237 ITR 39). The assessee filed further appeals in respect of the relevant assessment years to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), who confirmed the disallowance and dismissed the appeal. Aggrieved by the same, the assessee filed further appeals to the Income-tax Tribunal, which by reason of the impugned common order, non-suited the appellant for the relief claimed. 3. The very same issue involved in these appeals has been considered by this Court in the assessees own case reported in (2006) 285 ITR 84 (COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS. COMPUTER GRAPHICS LIMITED), wherein this Court has held that the activity of converting jumbo rolls into marketable small sizes cannot be regarded as a marketing activity and as such he is not entitled to the benefit of Section 80I. 4. COMPUTER GRAPHICS LIMITED), wherein this Court has held that the activity of converting jumbo rolls into marketable small sizes cannot be regarded as a marketing activity and as such he is not entitled to the benefit of Section 80I. 4. As there is no merit in these appeals and the above said question of law has already been answered against the assessee in the above case and also INDIA CINE AGENIES VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (2003) 261 ITR 491, these appeals are dismissed. Consequently, the connected M.P.Nos.1 of 2008 are also dismissed.