Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2008 DIGILAW 3408 (MAD)

L. Kalyamoorthy v. State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Secretary, Local Administrative Dept. , Fort St. George & Another

2008-09-17

M.JAICHANDREN

body2008
Judgment :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent. 2. Though the prayer is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the petitioner is may be permitted to make a representation to the second respondent with regard to the relief’s sought for in the writ petition, and if the second respondent is directed to dispose of the same, within a specified period. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection for this Court passing such an order. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the second respondent, with regard to the relief’s sought for in the writ petition, within a period of four weeks from today, and on such representation being submitted, the second respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits, and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks thereafter. 5. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.