Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2008 DIGILAW 525 (RAJ)

State of Rajasthan v. M/s Gorisariya Pesticides & Fertilizers

2008-02-19

H.R.PANWAR

body2008
JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the order impugned. 2. It appears that the complaint has been dismissed in default as neither complainant nor counsel for the complainant appeared. 3. From the perusal of the order impugned and the events as noticed in the record, in my view, the trial court has option either to dismiss the complaint or adjourn the matter to some other date, but in the instant case earlier also the complainant failed to appear and therefore, the trial court had exercised the power of dismissal of the complaint which cannot be erroneous, when neither the complainant nor counsel for the complainant appeared. On earlier occasion, the application seeking exemption was also dismissed. 4. No case for interference is made out. The criminal misc. petition is, therefore, dismissed.Petition Dismissed *******