Judgment Prakash Tatia, J.—This appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the order of the Judge, Family Court dt. 18.12.2006 by which the Family Court refused to grant the divorce decree under Sec. 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on the joint application submitted by the appellant and respondent before the Family Court, Jodhpur. 2. Though the appellant and respondent both submitted joint application for grant of divorce petition under Sec. 13B of the Act of 1955 but before expiry of period of six months, the respondent-wife submitted application before the Court below that she wants to withdraw her consent for grant of divorce decree and in view of that withdrawal, the learned Judge, Family Court, dismissed the divorce petition. 3. Today both the parties are present in Court and submitted written compromise wherein the respondent gave her consent for grant of divorce under Sec. 13B of the Act of 1955. 3. Today both the parties are present in Court and submitted written compromise wherein the respondent gave her consent for grant of divorce under Sec. 13B of the Act of 1955. The terms of the compromise between the parties are incorporated in this order which are as under:- ßmijksDr izdj.k esa i{kdkjku ds e/; jkthukek fuEu izdkj gks x;k gS%& 1- ;g gS fd izR;FkhZ }kjk vkilh lgefr ls nk;j fookg foPNsn ;kfpdk esa foMªkW dh xbZ lgefr dks vihyh; Lrj ij iqu% nsrh gSA 2- ;g gS fd vihykFkhZ izR;FkhZ dks iwoZ esa #i;s 4]00]000@& pkj yk[k #i;s fnukad 14-06-2006] 15-06-2006 dks tfj;s fMek.M MªkV LFkkbZ Hkj.k iks"k.k ds :i esa vnk dj pqdk gS vkSj LFkkbZ Hkj.k iks"k.k dh bl jkfÓk dks :i;s 6]00]000@& N% yk[k :i;s rd c<+kus ds fy, lger gSA bl izdkj vc cdk;k #i;s 2]00]000@& nks yk[k #i;s vkt ls 15 fnol dh vof/k ds Hkhrj Hkhrj vFkkZr 05-03-2008 rd vihykFkhZ izR;FkhZ dks vnk dj nsxkA 3- ;g gS fd izR;FkhZ vius }kjk nk;j QkStnkjh eqdnek vUrZxr /kkjk 498,] 406 Hkk-n-la- dh fjiksVZ esa nk;j vafre izfrosnu la[;k 25@2006 tks U;k;ky; vij U;kf;d eftLVsªV la[;k 2] tks/kiqj dh vnkyr esa yafcr gS] ml vafre izfrosnu dks izR;FkhZ Lohdkj djus esa viuh vksj ls fojks/k ugha djsxhA 4- ;g gS fd blh izdkj ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; tks/kiqj esa izR;FkhZ dh vksj ls nk;j 125 n-iz-la- ds izdj.k la[;k 25@2007 rkjh[k isÓkh 10-04-2008 dks izR;FkhZ foMªkW dj lekIr djok nsxhA 5- ;g gS fd ukckfyx iq=h royhudkSj ds Hkj.k iks"k.k dk ftEek izR;FkhZ dk jgsxk vkSj iq=h royhudkSj izR;FkhZ ds ikl gh mlds laj{k.k esa gh jgsxhA 6- ;g gS fd ukckfyx cPph royhudkSj ds Hkj.k iks"k.k o Hkfo"; esa mRiUu gksus okys mlds fgrksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gqos izR;FkhZ vius Lo;a ds ,oa viuh iq=h royhu dkSj ds orZeku ,oa Hkfo"; ds Hkj.k iks"k.k ds vf/kdkj o ckfyx gksus dh voLFkk esa vihykFkhZ dh lEifÙk esa fufgr gksus okys mÙkjkf/kdkj ,oa vU; lHkh vf/kdkjksa dks bl jkthukek ds ek/;e ls r;lqnk mijksDr jkfÓk izkIrh ds iÓpkr~ lekIr djus dks izR;FkhZ viuh lgefr crkSj Lo;a ,oa crkSj izkd`frd lajf{kdk royhudkSj ds LoLFk :i ls iznku djrh gSA vr% jkthukek izLrqr dj fuosnu gS fd mijksDr jkthukek dks rLnhd fd;k tkdj vihykFkhZ dh ;g vihy Lohdkj dh tkos rFkk i{kdkjku ds e/; lEikfnr fookg fnukad 15-11-2004 dks fo?kfVr dj fookg foPNsn dh fMØh ikfjr QjekbZ tkosAÞ 4. Since in the petition filed under Sec. 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, the respondent has given consent for passing the decree, therefore, the decree for divorce is granted and the marriage of the appellant and respondent is declared to be dissolved from today. 5. The appeal is allowed accordingly.