JUDGMENT 1. - By filing this petition the petitioner has prayed to quash and set-aside the order dated 13.12.1994 passed by Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Rajasthan, Jaipur (for short `the learned Tribunal'). 2. Brief facts according to the case of the petitioner are that respondent No.2 Mr. Ram Kishore Sharma was promoted to the post of Dy. Collector from the post of Jiledar on the recommendations of the Departmental Promotion Committee vide order dated 15.1.1991 and he joined on the aforesaid post on 21.1.1991. Vide order dated 31.10.1997, before joining on the aforesaid post, the petitioner was given additional charge of the aforesaid post and respondent No.2 in pursuance of the said order, took over the charge. On 31.3.1987, the non-petitioner No.2 was given benefit of notional fixation of pay as per the provisions of Sub-rule 11 (A) of Rule 25 of the Rajasthan Engineering Sub-ordinate Service (Irrigation Branch) Rules, 1967 but he was not given actual monetary benefits, which benefits ought to have been given to him by the present petitioner. 3. Aggrieved with the above inactions, the respondent No.2 preferred an appeal before the learned Tribunal. 4. After hearing learned counsel for both the parties, the learned Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by respondent No.2 and directed the present petitioner to pay the petitioner a salary and allowances from 31.3.1987 to 20.1.1991 and remaining arrear of pay shall be paid within a period of three months, otherwise the petitioner shall be entitled to interest @ 12% from the date of order till the payment is made. 5. Much reliance has been placed by the learned counsel upon the judgment passed by learned Tribunal on 18.6.1992 in Gopal Singh Nandiwal v. State of Rajasthan, delivered in Appeal No. 351/1991 , which has been confirmed by this Court. The learned Tribunal in the impugned judgment has also observed that the case of present respondent No.2 is on better footing as compared to Gopal Singh Nandiwal's case (supra). 6. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and carefully gone through the entire material made available to me. 7. The facts of the present case clearly reveal that the judgment dated 13.12.1994 has been passed by the learned Tribunal after considering the entire material placed before it and the judgment passed by the learned Tribunal needs no interference by this Court. 8. 7. The facts of the present case clearly reveal that the judgment dated 13.12.1994 has been passed by the learned Tribunal after considering the entire material placed before it and the judgment passed by the learned Tribunal needs no interference by this Court. 8. The writ petition, is dismissed and the Judgment dated 13.12.1994 passed by the learned Civil Services Appellate Tribunal in Appeal No. 4/1993, is maintained.There will be no order as to costs.Writ Petition Dismissed. *******