Judgment : Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Advocate General and the learned counsel appearing for the private respondents, I am satisfied that the issue raised and arising for decision touching the sustainability of the impugned exercise under Rule 181 of the Kerala Cooperative Societies Rules, requires a deeper look. Presently, I am of the view that the petitioner has demonstrated a very strong prima facie case for interference in writ jurisdiction, notwithstanding that the matter relates to election. The fundamental question will be the scope of the power under Rule 181 of the KCS Rules and whether such power includes the power to issue an order in the nature of the impugned one. 2. Weighing the priorities, I am satisfied that the ends of justice would be secured if the election proceedings continue and polling is held, however that, results shall not be declared until further orders, though the votes can be counted and maintained in sealed cover by the 2nd respondent. For counter affidavit and consideration on priority, list on 29.2008.