Judgment Hon'ble SINGH, J.—Heard. 2. This appeal has been filed on behalf of claimants, who are dependents of deceased Mooli Devi alias Murli, for enhancement of the claim against the order of the leaned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (for short 'the Tribunal'), Jaipur City, Jaipur, dated 7th November, 1998. 3. On 7th August, 1998, Mooli Devi alias Murli (Since deceased) was dashed by offending Jeep No.RJ-14-3C-3559, while she was going on foot near Bilapur near Chomu Chandwaji Road and died on the spot. 4. Learned Counsel for the appellant has submitted that the deceased 44 years of age as per the identity card issued by the Election Commission of India and as such the multiplier of 15 should have been adopted instead of 12 adopted by the learned Tribunal. 5. Per contra, learned Counsel for the respondents supported the Award of the learned Tribunal on the ground that the same was passed after taking into consideration the evidence addused by the parties during the inquiry and no, interference is called for ion the point of quantum of compensation. 6. In view of the rival contentions and on perusal of the record, it is revealed that as per the identify card, the ate of the deceased was less than 45 years at the time of death and as such as per the structural liability provided in II Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act for guidance, the multiplier of 15 should have been adopted. Therefore, the amount of award deserves to be enhanced. 7. Accordingly, in view of the discussion, the amount of compensation awarded deserves to be enhanced from Rs.1,68,000/- to Rs.2,04,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% p.a. from the date of appeal i.e. 24th November, 1998, and the same shall be payable within three months from the date of this order and failure to do so, the amount shall entail interest at the rate of 9% p.a. from the date of appeal. 8. With these observations, the impugned award stands modified and the appeal stands disposed off.