Jheky] lnL;-&;g fuxjkuh jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼ftls rRipkr~ la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 230 ds vUrxZr Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] HkhyokM+k ds fu.kZ; fnukad 22-11-2007 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd izkFkhZ@oknh uUnk o vU; 2 us vizkFkhZ@izfroknh vejpUn ds fo:) ,d jktLo okn [kkrsnkjh ?kks"k.kk ,oa LFkkbZ fu"ks/kkK dk xzke nkark fuykojh rglhy cusM+k ftyk HkhyokM+k esa fLFkr vkjkft;kr ds lEcU/k esa izLrqr fd;kA okn ds lkFk izkFkhZx.k us ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dh /kkjk 212 dk izkFkZuk i= isk dj dgk fd fookfnr vkjkth lkfcd vkjkth [kljk uEcj 125 o 126 dqy fdrk 2 jdck 8 ch?kk 17 fcLok izkFkhZx.k ds firk ,oa nknk Jh ckyw ds [kkrsnkjh vf/kdkj dh Fkh o gS] ftlds orZeku esa vkjkth [kljk uEcj 571 o 572 dk;e gq,A uohu lsVyes.V ds nkSjku fookfnr vkjkth dkkhjke ¼vejpUn ds firk½ ds uke xyr [kkrsnkjh esa ntZ dj nh tcfd lkfcd vkjkth e`rd ckyw dh [kkrsnkjh dh Fkh] ijUrq cUnkscLr foHkkx ds vf/kdkfj;ksa us fcuk l{ke U;k;ky; ds vknsk ds fooknxzLr Hkwfe dkkhukFk ds uke ntZ dj nh] ftldk fd mUgsa dksbZ vf/kdkj ugha FkkA mUgsa dsoy iwoZ jktLo fjdkMZ ds bUnzkt dh iqujko`fr djuh pkfg,A vizkFkhZ vejpUn us bl xyr bUnzkt dk Qk;nk ysdj iath—r foØ; i= fnukad 28-10-2006 }kjk fooknxzLr vkjkth vizkFkhZ eSllZ jsQjk dksu bf.M;k tfj, izksizkbZVj eukst dqekj flag dks foØ; dj nh] ftldk lgkjk ysdu vizkFkhZ la- 2 izkFkhZ ds dCts dkr esa gLr{ksi dj jgs gS] tcfd rFkkdfFkr foØ; i= kwU; ,oa izHkkoghu gSA vr% izfroknhx.k dks ikcUn fd;k tk, fd os fooknxzLr vkjkth dh ekSds dh ;FkkfLFkfr cuk, j[ksa o izfroknh ds dCts dkr esa gLr{ksi u djsa] mUgsa csn[ky u djsaA lEeu rkehy ds ipkr~ vizkFkhZ la-1 o 2 us izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr izkFkZuk i= dk tokc izLrqr fd;kA i{kdkjksa dks lquus ds ipkr~ mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] cusMk us muds vknsk fnukad 28-9-2007 }kjk izkFkhZ dk izkFkZuk i= fujLr dj fn;kA mä vknsk ls O;fFkr gksdj izkFkhZx.k@oknhx.k us vihy Hkw izc/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] HkhyokM+k ds le{k izLrqr dh] ftls mUgksaus vius vknsk fnukad 22-11-2007 ds }kjk izkFkhZ dk izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 212 vf/kfu;e 1955 fujLr dj fn;k rFkk vihy dks yfEcr j[kkA mä vknsk ls O;fFkr gksdj izkFkhZx.k us izuxr fuxjkuh jktLo e.My jktLFkku] vtesj esa izLrqr dhA 3- i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koäkx.k dks lquk x;kA 4- izkFkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/käk dh nyhy gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds vknsk U;k;] fu;e o vfHkys[k ls ijs gksus ds dkj.k fujLr ;ksX; gSA v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa us viuh vf/kdkfjrk dk lgh iz;ksx ugha fd;k gSA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us tc izkFkhZx.k dh vihy dks Jo.kkFkZ xzg.k dj fy;k rks mUgsa ;FkkfLFkfr dk vknsk ikfjr djuk pkfg, FkkA izkFkhZx.k us jktLo fjdkMZ esa bUnzktksa dks gh pqukSrh nh rFkk v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us mlh dks vk/kkj ekudj izkFkhZx.k dk izkFkZuk i= fujLr dj {ks=kf/kdkjh lEcU/kh =qfV dhA Hkw izcU/k ds nkSjku fooknxzLr Hkwfe dk foHkktu ugha fd;k x;k Fkk rFkk fooknxzLr vkjkth izkFkhZx.k ds dCts esa gSA fooknxzLr vkjkth oknhx.k ds firk o nknk ckyw ds vdsys dh [kkrsnkjh dh gSA vr% izFke n`"V;k izdj.k izkFkhZx.k ds i{k esa gSA lgk;d Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh us Hkwfe ds lEcU/k esa fcuk fdlh vknsk ;k fMØh ds fooknxzLr Hkwfe dk foHkktu dj vizkFkhZx.k ds uke bUnzkt ntZ dj vf/kdkfjrk lEcU/kh =qfV dhA v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us mi[k.M vf/kdkjh dk vfHkys[k izkIr gksus ds iwoZ gh vknsk ikfjr dj fn;k] tks fujLr ;ksX; gSA v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us /kkjk 212 ^vf/kfu;e 1955* ds izkFkZuk i= dk fuLrkj.k bl izdkj dj fn;k] tSls fd os vihy dk fuLrkj.k dj jgs gksaA bl dkj.k izkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr fuxjkuh iks"k.kh; gSA vius mijksä dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus vkj-vkj-Mh- 1982 i`"B 720] vkj-vkj-Mh- 1985 i`"B 209] 1992 vkj-,y-MCY;w- 229 ,oa 2007 Mh-,u-ts- ¼3½ 1182 U;kf;d n`"Vkar rFkk fuxjkuh la[;k 156@2004@Vh-,-@muokuh ^Jherh Hkaoj daoj o vU; cuke eksrhflag o vU;* esa ikfjr vknsk fnukad 6-10-2004 izLrqr fd, vkSj v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds fu.kZ;ksa dks fujLr djus dk fuosnu fd;k vkSj dgk fd vihykFkhZx.k ds i{k esa vLFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk tkjh dh tk,A 5- vizkFkhZ la-1 o 2 ds fo}ku vf/koäk dh nyhy gS fd vknsk fnukad 22-11-2007 ds fo:) izkFkhZx.k dks vihy djuh pkfg, u fd fuxjkuh vkSj fuxjkuh iks"k.kh; u gksus ds dkj.k fujLr ;ksX; gSA fodYi esa vizkFkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koäk dk ;g Hkh dguk gS fd vknsk fnukad 22-11-2007 ,d vUrfje vknsk gS vkSj mlds fo:) fuxjkuh iks"k.kh; ugha gSA vius mijksä dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus 2001¼1½ vkj-vkj-Vh- 654] 1990¼1½ vkj-,y-vkj- 27 U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa ij Hkjkslk fd;kA v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us muds le{k tks vfHkys[k Fkk] mlds vuqlkj /kkjk 212 ^vf/kfu;e 1955* ds izkFkZuk i= ij vknsk ikfjr djus esa =qfV ugha dhA fookfnr vkjkth ij vizkFkhZx.k dk dCtk gSA jktLo vfHkys[k vizkFkhZx.k ds uke gSA vr% izFken`"V;k izdj.k vizkFkhZx.k ds i{k esa gSA ;fn mUgsa fooknxzLr vkjkth ls csn[ky fd;k x;k rks mUgsa viwj.kh; {kfr gksxhA lqfo/kk vlqfo/kk dk fl)kUr Hkh vizkFkhZx.k ds i{k esa gSA vr% izkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr fuxjkuh iks"k.kh; u gksus ds dkj.k fujLr dh tk,A 6- eSus i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koäkx.k dh nyhyksa ij euu fd;k o muds }kjk izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dk voyksdu fd;kA 7- eSa vizkFkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koäk dh bl nyhy ls lger ugha gwW fd vknsk fnukad 22-11-2007 ds fo:) vihy iks"k.kh; gSA eksrhyky jkenso rsyh o vU; cuke Hk.Mkjh] ,-vkbZ-vkj- 2002 NÙkhlx<+ 6 esa ekuuh; NÙkhlx< mPp U;k;ky; us /kkjk 104 lh-ih-lh- dh foospuk djrs gq, dgk gS %& "Clause (i) of sub-section (1) of Section 104 provides that an appeal shall lie against an order made under rules from which an appeal is expressly allowed by rules. An appeal under Order 43, Rule 1 shall lie against the first order because the rule say that such an appeal shall be permissible. The law nowhere say that even against appellate order granting or rejecting the injunction, a second appeal is maintainable in the High Court. Sub-rule (2) above clearly bars an appeals against the appellate order." 8- izuxr izdj.k esa fooknxzLr vkjkth tfj, foØ; i= vizkFkhZ la- 1 }kjk vizkFkhZ la- 2 dks foØ; dh tk pqdh gSa vknsk 41 fu;e 5¼1½ lh-ih-lh- bl izdkj gS % ^^5- vihy U;k;ky; }kjk jksdk tkuk ¼1½ : vihy dk izHkko ftl fMØh ;k vknsk dh vihy dh xbZ gS] mlds v/khu dh dk;Zokfg;ksa dks jksduk ugha gksxk] fdUrq ;fn vihy U;k;ky; vknsk ns rks dk;Zokfg;kW jkdh tk ldsaxha dsoy bl dkj.k ls fd fMØh ls vihy dh xbZ gS] fMØh dk fu"iknu ugha gks tk,xk] fdUrq vihy U;k;ky; ,slh fMØh dk fu"iknu jksds tkus ds fy, vknsk i;kZIr gsrqd ls ns ldsxkA** ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; ds rhu U;k;k/khkksa dh ihB us deyknsoh cuke r[rey ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1964 ,l-lh- 589 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd % "The filing of an appeal does not automatically suspend the operationof an order appealed from unless the Appellate Court stays it or a statute conferring right of appeal provides for such a stay. Section 40 of the act confers a right of appeal on an aggrieved party against the final order of a Tribunal to the High Court. The section conferring the said power does not provide for a statutory stay of the order of the Tribunal till the disposal of the appeal. Indeed O. XLI, R. 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which embodies the general principle of law stays that an appeal shall not operate as a stay of proceedings under a decree or order appealed from except so far teh Appellate Court may order. This principle which applies to stay of proceedings under an order will apply with greater force to a suspension of an order. This principle which applies to stay of proceedings under an order will apply with greater force to a suspension of an order. The Judicial Committee in Juscum Boid vs. Pirthi Chand Lal, 46 Ind App 52 at p. 56; (AIR 1918 PC 151 at p., 153) summarised the Indian law of procedure thus: ".....under the Indian law and procedure an original decree is not suspended by presentation of an appeal nor is its operation interrupted where the decree on appeal is one of dismissal." vr% eS izkFkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koäk dh bl nyhy ls lger ugh gwW fd ,d ckj fuxjkuh dks Jo.kkFkZ xzg.k dj fy;k x;k rks LFkxu vknsk ikfjr djuk ykfteh gSA 9- vknsk 41 fu;e 11¼1½ lh-ih-lh- bl izdkj gS % 11- fupys U;k;ky; dks lwpuk fcuk vihy [kkfjt djus dh kfä ¼1½ vihy U;k;ky; vihykFkhZ ;k mlds IyhMj dks lquus ds fy;s fnu fu;r djus ds ipkr~ vkSj ;fn og bl fnu milatkr gksrk gS rks rn~uqlkj mls lquus ij vihy [kkfjt dj ldrk gSA** Devi Theatre vs. Vishwanath Raju ¼2004½ 7 ,l-lh-lh- 337 ds iSjk 5 esa vknsk 41 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- dh foospuk djrs gq, ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us dgk gS fd %& "5. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that appeal lies from every decree passed by any Court exercising original jurisdiction. The jurisdiction of the Court in first appeal extends to examine the questions of facts as well as that of law. It is though true as pointed out by the learned counsel for the respondent that under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC it would be open for the Court to dismiss the appeal in limine at the time of admission but even examining the matter from that point of view we find that the Court while considering the question of admission of appeal filed under Section 96 CPC, may admit the appeal if considered fit for full hearing having prima facie merit. Otherwise, if it finds that the appeal lacks merits, it may be dismissed at the initial stage itself." mijksä ls Li"V gS fd vihyh; U;k;ky;] v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk vfHkys[k eaxok, fcuk gh vihy dks fujLr dj ldrh gSA bl dkj.k v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] cusMk }kjk vfHkys[k izkIr fd, fcuk gh tks vknsk ikfjr dj fn;k] mls fof/k fo:) ugha dgk tk ldrkA 10- ;g fufoZokn gS fd Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] HkhyokM+k ds le{k izkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr vihy la[;k 67@2007 yfEcr gSA 11- Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] HkhyokM+k }kjk ikfjr vknsk fnukad 22-11-2007 vUrjorhZ vknsk gS] tks fuf.kZr ekeyksa esa ugha vkrk gS rFkk izkFkhZx.k dk ;g vk{ksi ugha gS fd vknsk fnukad 22-11-2007 diViwoZd izkIr fd;k x;k gSA cynso nkl cuke fQYeLrku fMLVªhC;wVlZ ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1970 ,l-lh- 406 ds iSjk 10 esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g dgk gS fd % "A case may be said to be decided, if the Court adjudicates for the purposes of the suit some right or obligation of the parties in controversy; every order in the suit cannot be regarded as a case decided within the meaning of Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure." ekuuh; xksok mPp U;k;ky; us Ganesh Shanker Naik vs. Joao Jose Catao Peregrino do Cista ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1976 xksok 24 ds U;kf;d n`"VkUr esa vknsk 41 fu;e 5 lh-ih-lh- dh foospuk djrs gq, iSjk 8 o 9 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfj rfd;k gS fd % "The order under Order 41 Rule 5 for staying of execution of decree has nothing to do with an adjudication of the rights of obligations of the parties to the suit or appeal. It is just a discretionary power given to the Appellate Court which may for sufficient cause, order stay of execution Refusal to exercise such discretion does not amount to decide a "Case" and therefore, Section 115 is not attracted in such a case. (Para 8) Even though the order, refusing to grant stay, is not comprehensive (i.e. order passed without giving detailed reasons) still by doing so there is no contravention of the provisions of the C.P.C. when the Court has jurisdiction to refuse stay of execution. (Para 8) Even though the order, refusing to grant stay, is not comprehensive (i.e. order passed without giving detailed reasons) still by doing so there is no contravention of the provisions of the C.P.C. when the Court has jurisdiction to refuse stay of execution. ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us ,l-,- cuthZ cuke LVsV vkWQ jktLFkku ,.M vnlZ 1990¼1½ vkj-,y-vkj- 27 ds U;kf;d n`"VkUr esa ;g dgk gS fd % "The learned Munsif rejected the application of the petitioner filed under O. 39, Rr. 1 & 2 C.P.C. and that order being appealable, the petitioner filed an appeal under O. 41, C.P.C. If any stay is sought from the Appellate Court, then application would be under O. 41 R. 5 C.P.C. So the plaintiff-petitioner might have moved an application before the learned District Judge under O. 39, Rr. 1 & 2 C.P.C., but actually that was under O. 41, R. 5 C.P.C., and the learned District Judge did not agree to grant interim stay. As is clear from the impugned order, the miscellaneous appeal is pending, and the date fixed therein was 27th May, 1988. Now, as stated by the learned counsel for the respondents the next date is 12th Aug., 1988. It means the appeal is pending, and the order of the learned District Judge, is not a final order. This order being an interlocutory order, and the main appeal being pending, no revision lies against such an order, before this Court. Now, as stated by the learned counsel for the respondents the next date is 12th Aug., 1988. It means the appeal is pending, and the order of the learned District Judge, is not a final order. This order being an interlocutory order, and the main appeal being pending, no revision lies against such an order, before this Court. The plaintiff-petitioner should approach the learned District Judge, for hearing this appeal at an early date, if he thinks that the matter is so important for him." lkso.kZ flag cuke jktskflag o vU; 2001¼1½ vkj-vkj-Vh- 654 esa jktLo e.My dh ,dy ihB us vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS % ^^jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955&/kkjk 230&jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] Hkjriqj us vius ;gk¡ yfEcr vihy esa LFkxu izkFkZuk i= dks fujLr dj fn;k&;g r; fd;k x;k fd ,slk vknsk fu.kZ; dh rkjhQ esa ugha vkrk gS] D;ksafd vihy vf/kdkjh us vihy ds lEcU/k esa dksbZ Qkbf.Max ugha nh gS tSlk fd 1973 vkj-vkj-Mh- 47] 1989 vkj-vkj-Mh- 405 o 1994 vkj-vkj-Mh- 412 esa r; fd;k x;k gS&fuxjkuh Jo.k ;ksX; ugha gksus ls mls mlh Lrj ij fujLr dj nh xbZA** 12- izuxr izdj.k esa Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] HkhyokM+k ds vknsk fnukad 22-11-2007 ds i<+us ls Li"V gS fd mUgksaus i{kdkjksa ds vf/kdkjksa ;k nkf;Roksa dk vfUre :i ls fuLrkj.k ugha fd;k gSA bl dkj.k vknsk fnukad 22-11-2007 ^dsl fMlkbZMsV* ds vUrxZr ugha vkrk rFkk izkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUr vthr kekZ cuke jkeiky kekZ o vU; 2007¼3½ Mh-,u-ts- ¼jkt-½ 1182] xksojpUn cuke xtflag] 1982 vkj-,y-MCY;w- 229] dkuflag cuke ekyflag] vkj-vkj-Mh- 1985 i`B 209] Mwaxjjke cuke eq- nhIrh] vkj-vkj-Mh- 1982 i`"B 720 rFkk fuxjkuh la[;k 156@2004@Vh-,-@muokuh ^Jherh Hkoajdaoj o vU; cuke eksrh flag o vU;* esa ikfjr vknsk fnukad 6-10-2004 izuxr izdj.k ds rF;ksa ls fHkUu gksus ds dkj.k pLik ugha gksrsA 13- pwafd izdj.k dk vUrorhZ Lrj ij ijh{k.k fd;k tk jgk gS] vr% ;gka Li"V fd;k tkrk gS esjs }kjk tks dksbZ Hkh laizs{k.k fd;k x;k gS] og v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk xq.kkxq.k ij vihy dk vfUre fuLrkj.k fd, tkus ij dksbZ izHkko ugha MkysxkA 14- mijksä foospu ds ifj.kkeLo:i ;g fuxjkuh [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] HkhyokM+k dks funsZk fn, tkrs gS fd os mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] cusM+k ds ;gka ls vfHkys[k ryc dj muds ;gka yfEcr vihy la[;k 67@2007 dks ;FkklEHko vkt fnukad ls pkj ekg esa fuLrkfjr djsaA 15- vknsk [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA