JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The plaintiff/petitioner filed a suit for permanent injunction against the defendant/respondents in the trial Court, along with the application for temporary injunction, which was dismissed by the trial Court vide its order dated 26.07.1997. Thereafter, an appeal was preferred, which was also dismissed by the Appellate Court vide its order dated 29.04.2004. Both the orders passed by the trial court as well as Appellate Court have been challenged by the plaintiff/petitioner in this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. A notice to show cause was issued to the respondents and the interim order maintaining the status-quo was passed way back on 13.05.2004 by this Court and since then the same is operating, therefore, without going into merits and demerits of the case, I think it fit and proper to direct the trial Court to expedite the suit itself and try to dispose of the suit within a period of one year. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial court to expedite the trial of the suit and try to dispose of the suit finally within a period of one year. 5. The interim order passed by this Court on 13.05.2004 maintaining status quo shall remain in force during the pendency of the suit.There will be no order as to costs.Writ petition disposed of as above. *******