Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2008 DIGILAW 91 (RAJ)

Subhash Chandra v. Krishan Kumar

2008-01-12

KAMAL NAYAN SHRIMAL

body2008
Jheky] lnL;-&;g fuxjkuh jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼ftls rRipkr~ la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 230 ds vUrxZr jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] guqekux<+ }kjk vihy la- 26@2001 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 2-4-2002 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd oknh —".kdqekj us izfroknh tsBkjke] xsykjke] nsohyky] cyjke ds fo:) pd 4 vkj-vkj-MCY;w- ds iRFkj ua- 125@238 dsfdyk ua- 8] 13] 18 o 21 rk 23 dqy 6 ch?kk Hkwfe ds lEcU/k esa lgk;d dyDVj] guqekux< ds U;k;ky; esa okn izLrqr fd;kA okn ds yfEcr jgrs lqHkk"kpUnz o egsUnz dqekj dks i{kdkj cuk;k x;kA fnukad 21-9-1999 dks lqHkk"kpUnz ds vf/koäk us fgnk;r iSjoh ugha gksuk tkfgj fd;k vkSj mlds fo:) ,d i{kh; dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ xbZ vkSj fnukad 20-5-2000 dks fopkj.k U;k;ky; us oknh dk okn ,drjQk fuf.kZr o fMØh dj fn;kA izfroknh lqHkk"kpUnz us ,d izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr vknsk 9 fu;e 13 lh-ih-lh- isk dj ,drjQk fMØh fnukad 20-5-2000 o ,drjQk vknsk fnukad 21-9-1999 dks vikLr djus dk fuosnu fd;kA i{kdkjksa dks lquus ds ipkr~ fopkj.k U;k;ky; us muds vknsk fnukad 12-7-2001 }kjk izfroknh lqHkk"kpUnz dk izkFkZuk i= fujLr dj fn;kA mä vknsk ls O;fFkr gksdj izfroknh lqHkk"kpUnz us vihy jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] guqekux<+ ds le{k izLrqr dhA i{kdkjksa dks lquus ds ipkr~ jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] guqekux<+ us muds vknsk fnukad 2-4-2002 }kjk izfroknh lqHkk"kpUnz dh vihy fujLr dj nhA mä vknsk ls O;fFkr gksdj vihykFkhZ@izfroknh lqHkk"kpUnz us ;g fuxjkuh jktLo e.My jktLFkku] vtesj esa isk dhA 3- eSus i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koäkx.k dh cgl lquhA 4- fo}ku vf/koäk izkFkhZ dk dFku gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds fu.kZ; rF;ksa ,oa fof/kd izko/kkuksa ds fo:) gSa uks bULVªdku IyhM djus ds iwoZ izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koäk izkFkhZ dks dksbZ lwpuk ugha nh tks dkuwuu vko;d gSA vius mijksä dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus 1998 Mh-,u-ts- ¼1½ ¼,l-lh-½ 47 dk lgkjk fy;kA izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koäk dk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd vf/koäk dh xyrh ds fy, izkFkhZ dks nks"kh ugha Bgjk;k tk ldrkA vius bl dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus 2003 vkj-ch-ts- 18] ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1998 ,llh 258 o 2001 vkj-ch-ts- 376 U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dks izLrqr fd;kA izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koäk dh ;g Hkh nyhy gS fd fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 20-5-2000 ds fo:) mUgksaus l{ke U;k;ky; esa tkudkjh dh fnukad ls vknsk 9 fu;e 13 lh-ih-lh- dk izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj fn;k vkSj izkFkZuk i= dks izLrqr djus esa tks foyEc gqvk mldk mYys[k mUgksaus izkFkZuk i= esa gh dj fn;k] bl dkj.k vyx ls ifjlhek vf/kfu;e] 1963 dh /kkjk 5 dk izkFkZuk i= isk djus dh vko;drk ugha Fkh vkSj v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds fu.kZ; =qfViw.kZ gksus ds dkj.k fujLr fd, tk,a rFkk vius mijksä dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus 1995 Mh-,u-ts- ¼1½ jkt- 203] 2002¼1½ Mh-,u-ts- ¼,l-lh-½ ist 67 ij Hkjkslk fd;kA 5- fo}ku vf/koäk vizkFkhZ dk dFku gS fd ,di{kh; dk;Zokgh dh tkudkjh izkFkhZ dks izkjEHk ls gh FkhA izkFkZuk i= ds lkFk izkFkhZ us foyEc dks {kek djus ds fy, dksbZ izkFkZuk i= izLrqr ugha fd;kA izkFkhZ mlds Lo;a dh xyrh ds fy, Qk;nk ugha ys ldrkA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us izkFkhZ dk izkFkZuk i= o vihy fujLr djus esa dksbZ {ks=kf/kdkj lEcU/kh =qfV ugha dhA vr% izkFkhZ dh fuxjkuh fujLr dh tk,A vius mijksä dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus vkj-vkj-Mh- 2000 ist 557] ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1998 ,llh 258 izLrqr dhA 6- eSus nksuksa i{kksa ds fo}ku vf/koäkx.k dh cgl ij euu fd;k vkSj i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA 7- ;g ckr fufoZokn gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa Jh bUnzk.k xksnkjk us izkFkhZ ds vf/koäk dh gSfl;r ls odkyrukek fnukad 5-9-1990 dks isk fd;k vkSj fnukad 21-9-1999 dks vkokt fnykus ij vnkyr esa gkftj gq;s vkSj uks bULVªDku IyhM fd;kA ,slh fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ lqHkk"kpUnz ds bl dFku esa cgqr lkj gS fd vnkyr ekrgr dks bdrjQk dk;Zokgh djus ds iwoZ izkFkhZ dks uksfVl nsuk pkfg;s FkkA fefYd;r flag fo:) tksxsUnz flag ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1998 lqizhe dksVZ ist 258 ds iSjk 7 esa fuEufyf[kr fu.kZ; iznku fd;k x;k gS fd %& "A perusal of the record also reveals that the appellants were neither careless or negligent in defending the suit. They had engaged a counsel and were following the proceedings. In this fact situation, the trial Court, which had admittedly not issued any notice to the appellants after their counsel had reported no instructions, should have in the interest of justice, allowed that application and proceeded in the case from the stage when the counsel reported no instructions." jktLo e.Mu us vkj-vkj-Mh- 1994 ist 172 cnzh izlkn cuke lkfo=h nsoh esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd % "In the larger interest of justice and with a view to see that the common man is not put to avoidable hardship, it would be better and proper that the Court takes care of this aspect also and sees to it that the part of the fee which has not been earned by the advocate is refunded to the litigant. "Without complying with this later part of the rule, ordinarily the advocate should not be permitted to retire from the case. it was further held that before doing so the Court must feel satisfied that the provisions of the aforesaid rules are complied with. Thereafter the Court ought not to proceed further in absence of the parties. The Court itself must make efforts to secure the presence of parties. At any rate, without issuing fresh summons directing the party to remain present in the Court (either personally or through advocate) and without informing him about the necessity to make appropriate arrangements for proceeding further with the case. The Court itself must make efforts to secure the presence of parties. At any rate, without issuing fresh summons directing the party to remain present in the Court (either personally or through advocate) and without informing him about the necessity to make appropriate arrangements for proceeding further with the case. If this is not done the object and the spirit with which the aforesaid rule has been enacted by the Bar Council of India, will be frustrated." blh fl)kUr dks jktLo e.Mu us y[kth cuke ckoyk vkj-vkj-Mh- 2002 ist 666 ij izfrikfnr fd;k gSA 8- izkFkhZ us U;k;ky; mi ftyk/khk] guqekux< esa ,drjQk vknsk o fMØh dks fujLr djokus dk izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k] mlesa mlus foyEc dks {kek djus ds lEcU/k esa i;kZIr dkj.kksa dk mYys[k fd;k rFkk lkFk gh ifjlhek vf/kfu;e] 1963 dh /kkjk 5 dk izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;kA izkFkZuk i= ds lkFk izkFkhZ us kiFk i= izLrqr ugha fd;kA ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us nsosUnz iky lgxy ,.M ,unj cuke eSllZ izrki LVhy jksfyax feYl izk-fy- ,.M vnlZ 2002 Mh-,u-ts- ¼1½ ¼,llh-½ 67 esa dgk gS fd % "Civil Procedure Code, 1908—O. 9 R. 9—Limitation Act, 1963—Sec. 5—Application for restoration of suit dismissed on the ground of non-appearance of parties or their attorney—Ground of delay also mentioned in restoration application—Contention that no separate application for condonation of delay filed—Held, Rejected—Trial Court while allowing restoration application has considered the delay and has condoned it." ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us eksgEen ;quwl cuke jktsUnz dqekor ,.M ,unj 1995 Mh-,u-ts- ¼1½ ¼jkt-½ 203 esa dgk gS fd % "Limitation Act, 1963—Sec. 5 and Civil Procedure Code, 1908—O. 9 R. 13—Condonation of delay—Contents for condoning the delay state in application filed u/O. 9 R. 13—Held, Separate application u/s. 5 is not required." mijksä U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa ds ifjizs{; esa esjh lqfopkfjr jk; esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us izkFkhZ dh vihy ifjlhek ds fcUnq ij fujLr dj {ks=kf/kdkj lEcU/kh =qfV dh gS] foks"kdj tcfd izkFkhZ us vihy ds Kkiu esa vihy dks izLrqr djus ds dkj.kksa dk mYys[k dj fn;k rFkk vihy ds Kkiu ij mlds gLrk{kj gSA vizkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUr gfjflag o vU; cuke lcyflag vkj-vkj-Mh- 2000 i`"B 557 rF;ksa esa fHkUu gksus ds dkj.k pLik ugha gksrhA 9- fu.kZ; fnukad 20-5-2000 ds fo:) izkFkhZ us mi[k.M vf/kdkjh ds U;k;ky; esa vknsk 9 fu;e 13 lh-ih-lh- dk izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k] ftls mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] guqekux<+ us muds vknsk fnukad 12-7-2001 }kjk fujLr dj fn;k] ftlds fo:) izkFkhZ us jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] guqekux< ds le{k vihy la- 26@2001 izLrqr dh] ftls mUgksaus muds vknsk fnukad 2-4-2002 }kjk fujLr dj nhA fnukad 21-9-1999 dks tc izkFkhZ ds vf/koäk us uks bULVªDku IyhM dj fn, rks U;k;ky; dks esjh lqfopkfjr jk; esa vkxs dh rkjh[k iskh nsuh pkfg, Fkh vkSj izkFkhZ ds vf/koäk dks ikcUn djuk pkfg, FkkA ,slk u dj mi[k.M vf/kdkjh us tks ,di{kh; dk;Zokgh djus dk vknsk ikfjr fd;k og fof/k fo:) gS vkSj fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA vr% mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] guqekux<+ dk vknsk fnukad 21-9-1999 o fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 20-5-2000 ,oa mi[k.M vf/kdkjh }kjk ikfjr vknsk fnukad 12-7-2001 rFkk jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] guqekux<+ }kjk vihy la- 26@2001 esa ikfjr vknsk fnukad 2-4-2002 fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA 10- QyLo:i mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] guqekux<+ dk vknsk fnukad 21-9-1999] fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 20-5-2000 o vknsk fnukad 12-7-2001 ,oa jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] guqekux<+ }kjk vihy la- 26@2001 esa ikfjr vknsk fnukad 2-4-2002 vkB lkS :i;s dh dkWLV ij fujLr fd;s tkrs gSA izkFkhZ dks funsZk fn, tkrs gS fd og vizkFkhZ —".kdqekj dks dkWLV ds 800@& :- fnukad 17-1-2008 ds iwoZ vnk djsa vkSj jlhn mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] guqekux< ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr djsaA ;fn izkFkhZ lqHkk"kpUnz fnukad 17-1-2008 rd dkWLV ds vkB lkSk :i;s vizkFkhZ —".kdqekj dks vnk djus esa vlQy jgrk gS rks ;g fuxjkuh fujLr le>h tkosA 11- i{kdkjksa dks funsZk fn, tkrs gS fd og mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] guqekux< ds U;k;ky; esa fnukad 10-1-2008 dks mifLFkr gksa] ml jkst U;k;ky; vkxs dh dk;Zokgh lqfufpr djsxkA fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA