Research › Search › Judgment

Punjab High Court · body

2009 DIGILAW 1031 (PNJ)

Kamlesh And Others v. Union Of India

2009-05-29

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN

body2009
Judgment Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 15.5.2008 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh, (for short, the Tribunal), whereby the claim application has been allowed and amount of Rs. 4,00,000 (rupees four lakh) has been awarded to the appellants to be shared by all the appellants to the tune of Rs. 1,00,000 (rupees one lakh) each, out of which it has been ordered that Rs. 50,000 payable to appellant No. 1 (Kamlesh) shall be kept in a fixed deposit in her favour in a nationalised bank for a period of three years with liberty to her to withdraw quarterly interest on such FDR and the remaining amount of Rs. 50,000 shall be paid to her immediately and the amount awarded to the other claimants-appellant Nos. 2 to 4 who are minor, shall also be kept in fixed deposit in their favour till they attain the age of majority. It has been further ordered that the respondent shall make the aforesaid payment within 60 days, failing which the appellants shall be entitled to recover the compensation amount with interest at the rate of 9 per cent from the date of the order till the date of realization. 2. The only argument raised by learned counsel for the appellants is in respect of the deposit order of the Tribunal whereby the amount of Rs. 50,000 has been ordered to be deposited in the FDR in the name of appellant No. 1-Kamlesh, who is aged 48 years and is a major and also for not awarding interest from the date of filing of the claim petition. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants has relied upon a decision of this court in the case of Seema Rani v. Union of India, F.A.O. No. 5037 of 2008. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that the present appeal deserves to be allowed after the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of H.S. Ahammed Hussain v. Irfan Ahammed, 2002 ACJ 1559 (SC) and Asraf v. Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Gurgaon, (2007-3) 147 PLR 692. 5. The amount of compensation payable to the claimant who is adult and major cannot be ordered to be deposited in the FDR and has to be paid in cash. 5. The amount of compensation payable to the claimant who is adult and major cannot be ordered to be deposited in the FDR and has to be paid in cash. Similarly, in view of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of N. Parameswaran Pillai v. Union of India, 2002 ACJ 841 (SC) and of this court in Usha Rani v. Union of India, 2005 ACJ 1611 (P&H), the amount of interest has to be paid from the date of filing of the claim petition and not from the date of the order. 6. In view of the above discussion, the present appeal is, thus, allowed. The order of the Tribunal is modified and it is directed that the entire amount of compensation awarded to appellant No. 1-Kamlesh shall be paid to her in cash forthwith along with interest at the rate of 9 per cent from the date of filing of the claim petition. Appeal allowed.