Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2009 DIGILAW 1238 (RAJ)

Sitaram v. Arjunlal

2009-05-05

N.K.JAIN

body2009
tSu] lnL;-&;g fuxjkuh vUrxZr /kkjk 230 jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼la{ksi esa vf/kfu;e½ fo:) vkns'k Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] lhdj fnukad 17-12-2008 is'k dh xbZ gSA 2- nkSjkus lquokbZ vizkFkhZ ds vf/koDrk us ,d izkFkZuk i= is'k dj izkjafHkd vkifRr dh] ftl ij mHk; i{k ds vf/koDrkvksa dh cgl lquh xbZA 3- vizkFkhZ ds vf/koDrk us cgl esa crk;k fd ;g fuxjkuh varfje vkns'k fnukad 17-12-08 ds fo:) is'k dh xbZ gS] ftlesa jsdkMZ o ekSds dh ;FkkfLFkfr cuk;s j[kus dk vkns'k fn;k x;k Fkk vr,oa ;g dsl fMlkbMsM dh Js.kh esa ugha vkrk gSA fdUrq e.My }kjk vkns'k fnukad 2-3-09 ls fuxjkuh ,MfeV djrs gq, v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds vkns'k dh ikyuk LFkfxr dj nh] blds QyLo:i fookfnr Hkwfe ds [kqnZ­cqnZ gksus dk [krjk mRiUu gks x;k gSA pwafd vizkFkhZ us /kkjk 88 o 188 vf/kfu;e ds rgr LoRo dk okn is'k dj j[kk gS vr% mlesa fu.kZ; gksus rd ekSds o jsdkMZ dh ;FkkfLFkfr cuk;s j[kuk cgqr t:jh gSA mUgksaus vuqjks/k fd;k fd bl fuxjkuh dks viks"k.kh; gksus ls blh Lrj ij [kkfjt fd;k tkos ;k oSdfYid rkSj ekSds o jsdkMZ dh ;FkkfLFkfr j[krs gq, jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh dks izdj.k fjekUM dj fn;k tkos tks loZizFke fe;kn ds fcUnq ij fofu'p; djsaxsA 4- izkFkhZ ds vf/koDrk us cgl ds mRrj esa crk;k fd vizkFkhZ us djhc 250 fnu ckn jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh ds ;gka vihy is'k] tks fe;kn ckgj FkhA mudk rdZ gS fd jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh dks loZizFke fe;kn ds fcUnq ij fofu'p; djuk pkfg;s fdUrq ,slk ugha fd;k x;k ,oa fe;kn dk fcUnq vfuf.kZr j[krs gq, vizkFkhZ ds gd esa LFkxu tkjh fd;k x;k] tks vkns'k 41 fu;e 3 , ¼3½ lhihlh dh ea'kk ds fo:) gSA mUgksaus 2006 vkjchts ist 78] 2008 vkjchts ist 296] 526] 622 ds U;kf;d n`"Vkar m)fjr fd;s ,oa bl U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 2-3-09 dks fØ;kfUorh LFkfxr djus laca/kh vkns'k dks lehphu crk;kA mUgksaus ;g Hkh dFku fd;k fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk mls ugha lquk x;k FkkA mUgksaus /kkjk 5 fe;kn vf/kfu;e ds izkFkZuk i= ij loZizFke lquokbZ djus gsrq izdj.k jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh dks fjekUM djus ij lgefr O;Dr dh fdUrq ;FkkfLFkfr dk vkns'k ugha fn;k tkuk pkfg;sA 5- geus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa dh cgl ij euu fd;k o i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA 6- ;g fuxjkuh Hkw izca/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] lhdj ds vkns'k fnukad 17-12-08 ds fo:) is'k dh xbZ gS ftlesa jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh us fe;kn ds fcUnq ij fu.kZ; lqjf{kr j[krs gq, ekSds o jktLo jsdkMZ dh ;FkkfLFkfr cuk;s j[kus dk vkns'k fn;kA blls O;fFkr gksdj ;g fuxjkuh is'k dh xbZ gSA bl laca/k esa geus vkns'k 41 fu;e 3 , ¼3½ dk voyksdu fd;k] tks bl izdkj gS& "3A. Application for condonation of delay.- (3) Where an application has been made under sub-rule (1), the Court shall not make an order for the stay of execution of the decree against which the appeal is proposed to be filed so long as the Court does not, after hearing under due 11, decided to hear the appeal." 7- bl izlax esa izkFkhZ ds vf/koDrk }kjk m)fjr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa dk Hkh voyksdu fd;kA buls ;g tkfgj gksrk gS fd loZizFke fe;kn ds fcUnq ij fofu'p; fd;k tkuk pkfg;s ,oa foyEc ds 'keu dk vkns'k nsus ds ckn gh vihy l{ke gksrh gS ,oa rRi'pkr~ LFkxu laca/kh vkns'k fn;k tk ldrk gSA 8- izLrqr ekeys esa fe;kn ds fcUnq dks lqjf{kr j[krs gq, Hkw izca/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] lhdj }kjk vizkFkhZ ds gd esa jsdkMZ o ekSds dh ;FkkfLFkfr dk vkns'k fn;k x;k gS tcfd mijksDr dkuwuh izko/kkuksa o U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa ds en~nsutj loZizFke fe;kn ds fcUnq ij fofu'p; fd;k tkuk visf{kr gSA vr,o ;g izdj.k loZizFke fe;kn ds fcUnq ij fofu'p; djus gsrq Hkw izca/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] lhdj dks fjekUM ;ksX; ik;k tkrk gS] ftlds fy;s nksuksa i{k lger gSA 9- mijksDr foospu ds vuqlkj ;g fuxjkuh vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk Hkw izca/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] lhdj dk vkns'k fnukad 17-12-2008 fujLr fd;k tkdj izdj.k mUgsa fjek.M fd;k tkrk gS] tks loZizFke /kkjk 5 fe;kn vf/kfu;e ds izkFkZuk i= dk fofu'p; dj fu;ekuqlkj vihy dk fuLrkj.k djsasxsA fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA