Judgment ( 1. ) This matter has been heard on the following substantial question of law:- "Whether the finding of the learned Court below that the suit is barred by provision of section 57 of the M.P. Land Revenue Code is contrary to the Full Bench decision of this Court in the case of Ramgopal v. Chetu, 1976 JLJ 278 ?" ( 2. ) Briefly stated facts are that the plaintiff/appellant claimed Bhumiswami rights in respect of the suit land which is opposed by the defendants on the ground that the same is a government land being Charnoi. ( 3. ) In the case of Ramgopal v. Chetu ( 1976 JLJ 278 ), Chetu was claiming Bhumiswami rights against Ramgopal. This being so, it was held that civil Court has jurisdiction to decide question of title. Since in the present case, declaration of title is being sought against the State Government, the case is squarely covered by the Full Bench decision of this Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh v. Balveer Singh 2001 RN 343= 2001 (1) MPJR 546 ]. In such a situation, the rights are first to be decided by SDO under sub-section (1) of section 57 of M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959. ( 4. ) Faced with this situation, Shri Pradeep Shrivastava, learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the suit with liberty to approach the concerning SDO in accordance with section 57 (1) of M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959. ( 5. ) Prayer is accepted. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. He is also permitted to withdraw the suit with the aforesaid liberty. Appellant is also permitted to move an application for seeking interim relief before the SDO in accordance with law. No order as to costs.