Order This appeal has been filed by the appellant-Insurance Company against the judgment and award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Koderma in Claim Case No. 1 of 2006. 2. It is a case of death of a young boy aged about 25 years. The claimants are the elder brothers and sisters. 3. The Tribunal has taken very miser view and awarded only a sum of Rs. 1,50,000/-. Even then the Insurance Company has challenged the quantum of compensation. Mr. H.K. Singh, learned counsel appearing for the Insurance Company assailed the impugned judgment solely on the ground that the brothers and sisters, who are earning members, are not the dependents 4. In our view, the word 'dependent' has not been used in the Motor Vehicles Act. The word 'legal representatives' has been used in the Act. In case of death, the legal representatives of the deceased can maintain a claim case. This law is no longer res integra. In the case of Gujrat State Road Transport Corporation, Ahmedabad vs. Ramabhai Prabhatbhai and Another. [(1987)3 Supreme Court Cases 234] the Supreme Court held that the legal representatives include brothers of the deceased victim of motor accident are entitled to maintain application for compensation. 5. We are constrained to observe that in such a case, where the compensation amount is so less even then the Insurance Company for the sake of fighting litigation prefers appeal. 6. This appeal is dismissed.