ih- pUnz] lnL;-&izkFkhZx.k us ;g utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 84 jktLFkku Hkw-jktLo vf/kfu;e 1956 ds rgr bl U;k;ky; dh ekuuh; ,dyihB }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 17-4-1998 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr fd;k gSA 2- ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k us viuh cgl esa utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= esa mYysf[kr vk{ksiksa ds vk/kkj ij bl utjlkuh dks Lohdkj dj vkyksP; vkns'k fnukad 17-4-98 dks fujLr dj foi{khx.k dh fuxjkuh dks [kkfjt djus dh izkFkZuk dh gSA 3- blds foijhr foi{khx.k ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk us vkyksP; vkns'k dks fof/k lEer crk;k gSA mudk dFku gS fd utjlkuh ds ek/;e ls fof/k lEer fu.kZ; ij u rks iqu% fopkj fd;k tk ldrk gS uk gh mls vikLr fd;k tk ldrk gSA 4- eSaus mHk; i{k ds ;ksX; vf/koDrkx.k }kjk izLrqr cgl ij euu fd;k rFkk vkyksP; fu.kZ; ,oa utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= esa mYysf[kr vk{ksiksa dk Hkh /;kuiwoZd v/;;u ,oa euu fd;kA 5- eSa loZizFke fdlh Hkh ekeys ds iqufoZyksdu djus ls lEcfU/kr dkuwu dk mYys[k djuk mfpr le>rk gwaA bl lEcU/k esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us lqjsUnz dqekj odhy cuke phQ ,T;wD;qfVo vkfQlj e/; izns'k 2005¼1½ vkjvkjVh ist 545 ds fofu.kZ; esa izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd& "A point that has been heard and decided cannot form a ground for review even if assuming that the view taken in the judgment under review is erroneous." dUgS;kyky lSuh cuke LVsV vkWQ jktLFkku 2005 vkjchts ¼12½ ist 290 esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd& "The scope of review is very limited. It has been clearly held in a catena of cases that a judgment/order may be open to review u/O. R. 1 CPC if there is a mistake or an error apparent on the face of record. An error which is not self evident and has to be detected by the process of reasoning can hardly be said to be an error apparent on the face of record justifying exercise of power of review. In exercise of jurisdiction u/O. 47 R. 1 CPC, it is not permissible for an erroneous decision to be re-heard and corrected. There is clearly distinction between 'an erroneous decision' and 'an error apparent on the face of record.' While the former can be corrected by higher forum, the latter can be corrected by exercise of review jurisdiction. In exercise of jurisdiction u/O. 47 R. 1 CPC, it is not permissible for an erroneous decision to be re-heard and corrected. There is clearly distinction between 'an erroneous decision' and 'an error apparent on the face of record.' While the former can be corrected by higher forum, the latter can be corrected by exercise of review jurisdiction. A review petition has, therefore, a limited purpose and cannot be allowed to be an appeal in disguise." 6- mijksDr ewyHkwr fl)kUrksa dks e/;utj j[krs gq, tc eSus utjlkuh Kkiu esa mYysf[kr vfHkopuksa ,oa bl U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 17-4-98 dk v/;;u fd;k gS rks eSa ikrk gwa fd vkyksP; vkns'k Li"V] rdZlaxr ,oa fof/k lEer vkns'k gS ftlesa gLr{ksi djus ds dksbZ U;kf;d vk/kkj esjs le{k ugha gSA esjs Li"V er esa bl U;k;ky; ds vkyksP; fu.kZ; esa fdlh izdkj dh tkfgjk =qfV ^^error apparent on the face of the record" gksuk izrhr ugha gksrk gSA blds vykok Hkh mijksDr mYysf[kr fofu.kZ;ksa esa izfrikfnr fl)kUrksa ds vk/kkj ij fcuk fdlh tkfgjk =qfV ds vius iwoZ ds er ls foijhr u;s er dks lCLVhV~;wV (substitute) ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA ftl dkj.k ls eSa izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr utjlkuh esa dksbZ cy ugha ekurs gq, bls xzg.k fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha le>rk gwa vkSj bl Lrj ij gh [kkfjt fd;s tkus ;ksX; le>rk gwaA 7- ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= dks xzg.krk dh LVst ij gh vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA fu.kZ; fy[kk;k tkdj lquk;k x;kA