JUDGMENT ( 1 ) THIS is a petition by original land owner tribals. ( 2 ) THE land of tribals transferred to non-tribals was restored by Tahsildar by Order dated 24th October, 1975. ( 3 ) THE order was not executed for a long time. ( 4 ) THE non-tribal transferors filed an appeal before the Maharashtra revenue Tribunal challenging the order of restoration. It appears that what was challenged was a notice of delivery of possession, and, in fact, the order brought into scrutiny is order dated 24th October, 1975, by which restoration was ordered, which had attained finality by failure to file appeal against the said order. ( 5 ) THE Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal was kind and Courteous enough for condoning the delay in order to do substantive justice, and ultimately allowed the appeal, and has set aside the order of restoration of land to the tribal transferors. ( 6 ) THE Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal based its order on grounds, namely:- (a) The land was fallow five years prior to transfer. (b) The tribal transferors stated on oath that they cannot cultivate land and that the agreement of transfer was made on free will and without any coercion etc. (c) Tribal transferors could not come forward to take possession of the property. ( 7 ) AGGRIEVED by the order setting aside the order of restoration, present Writ Petition is filed by tribal transferors. ( 8 ) THE contents of the petition do clarify and reiterate with no ambiguity that the tribal transferors and their family members are not just willing, but are keen to have the land restored. ( 9 ) THE order passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal seems to have been based on compassion to a non-tribal than compassion to a party whose sufferance, and compassion towards whom had fructified into a statutory enactment. ( 10 ) IT was not open and available for any statutory authority exercise powers and jurisdiction under the Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled tribes Act, 1974, to undo the aims and objects and the very purpose of enacting of the said Act and constituting the authorities thereunder. An authority constituted under the said Act was not competent to defeat the purpose thereof. ( 11 ) THE Writ Petition, therefore, deserves to be allowed. An authority constituted under the said Act was not competent to defeat the purpose thereof. ( 11 ) THE Writ Petition, therefore, deserves to be allowed. Rule is made absolute in terms of Prayer Clauses (i) and (ii) with a direction to Tahsildar to restore the land to the tribals within six months from the date of receipt of Writ of this Court. Petition allowed.