Miss. Shryna Kesavan v. Director of Government Examinations
2009-06-22
M.JAICHANDREN
body2009
DigiLaw.ai
Judgment :- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent. 2. Though the prayer sought for by the petitioner in the present writ petition is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 15. 2009, is directed to be disposed of by the respondent, on merits, within a specified period. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, without going into the merits of case, the respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 15. 2009, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish to the respondent a copy of the representation, dated 15. 2009, along with a copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P is closed.