Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2009 DIGILAW 1932 (MAD)

Dr. K. Prakasam v. The Secretary to Government, Department of Health and Family Welfare & Others

2009-06-26

M.JAICHANDREN

body2009
Judgment :- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the third respondent, and if the third respondent is directed to dispose of the same, within a specified period. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection for this Court passing such an order. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the third respondent, within a period of two weeks from today, and on such representation being submitted, the third respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks thereafter. 5. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.