JUDGMENT 1. - Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record. 2. The learned counsel for the accused-petitioner has contended that even if the prosecution case is taken on its' face value, the case that can be made out against the petitioner under Section 120B 1PC. Furthermore, she is not only a lady, but also happens to be a mother of four months child. By her in incarceration, the child would also be forced to stay in the central jail. 3. The learned counsel for the complainant has vehemently opposed the bail application on the ground that she is the one who had conspired with the main accused for the murder of her own husband. Therefore, she is involved in the murder. 4. The learned public prosecutor has also opposed the bail application. 5. Without expressing any opinion into the merits and demerits of the case and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the bail application of the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.PC. 6. It is, therefore, ordered that the petitioner Smt. Phooli Devi W/o Late Shri Maliram shall be released on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. twenty thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for her appearance before the trial court as and when she is called upon to do so.Bail Application Allowed. *******