Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2009 DIGILAW 1997 (RAJ)

Banwari Lal v. State of Rajasthan Thro Its Public Prosecutor

2009-09-14

R.S.CHAUHAN

body2009
JUDGMENT 1. - Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record. 2. Acoridng to the learned counsel for the accused-petitioners, petitioner No. 1 happens to be an old man of 57 years. Furthermore, his brother Prabhati Lal had already filed an application before the Electricity Board pointing out to the Board that the electricity meter was not working properly. It is when the persons from Electricity Board came and certain verbal altercation took place as they were not in a position to correct the meter. Furthermore, the accused- petitioners are behind the bar for almost a week. Lastly, the case is triable by Special Court. 3. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 4. Without expressing any opinion into the merits and demerits of the case and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the bail application of the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 5. It is, therefore, ordered that the petitioners Banwari Lal S/o Phepha Ram and Chetan Kumar S/o Banwari Lal shall be released on bail provided each of them furnished a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. twenty thousand only) with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. twenty thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for their appearance before the trial Court as and when they are called upon to do so.Bail application allowed. *******