O RDER 1. Heard learned counsel on both sides. By consent, the matter is taken up for final hearing. 2. It appears from the impugned order that Securities Appellate Tribunal [for short, "S.A.T."] has dismissed the appeal of the appellant herein [Broker] against the order of suspension passed by Securities and Exchange Board of India [for short, "S.E.B.I."] only on the ground that the appellant has suffered the punishment. It is the case of the appellant that he had preferred Appeal No.65 of 2006 before S.A.T. to be decided on merits because he continues to carry the stigma imposed by virtue of the impugned order of S.E.B.I. We find merit in this contention. 3. For the afore-stated reasons, we setaside the impugned order and remit the case to S.A.T. for de novo consideration in accordance with law on merits. We, however, express no opinion on the merits of the case.