JUDGMENT 1. - The claimant appellant has filed this appeal against the judgment dated 17th July, 2000 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaipur City, Jaipur in motor accident claim No. 341/1993. 2. It is not necessary to narrate the facts in detail as the only question is that whether the amount of compensation awarded by learned Tribunal is fair and adequate? 3. The claimant appellant suffered four injuries in an accident which occurred on 28th April, 1993 out of which one on right arm and one on left leg were found to be grievous. As per the permanent disability certificate Ext. 1 the claimant appellant suffered 30.2% permanent disability in the right upper limb. Learned Tribunal has passed an award of Rs. 60,000/- in favour of the claimant appellant. 4. Learned counsel for the claimant-appellant submits that looking to the extent of disability suffered by the claimant appellant the compensation amount is grossly inadequate and it should be enhanced suitably. 5. Permanent disability certificate is Ext. 1 wherein it has been stated that the claimant appellant suffered 30.2% permanent disability in the right upper limb. However, no doctor has been examined and it has not been stated in the certificate that what is the nature of disability and what restriction or difficulty will be faced by the appellant. There is ambiguity. 6. Considering the evidence available on the record and all the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the compensation amount awarded by learned Tribunal is fair and adequate and there is no ground for enhancement.Consequently, the appeal stands dismissed.Appeal dismissed. *******