JUDGMENT 1. - This misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing of F.I.R. No. 115/2009 registered at Anti Corruption Bureau, Jaipur under Sections 7, 13(1)(D)(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 read with Section 120-B I.P.C. vis-n-z'is the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the investigation, it has been found that no direct or indirect evidence regarding allegation of taking bribe has been proved against the petitioner. 3. This Court vide order dated 22.10.2009 directed the Public Prosecutor to call for the case diary. The case diary is produced before this Court. In the investigation made by Deputy Superintendent of Anti Corruption Bureau, it is categorically stated that during the investigation no direct or indirect evidence has been found against the petitioner, but has recommended for the departmental enquiry against the petitioner. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 and also perused the material available on record. 5. Since no direct or indirect evidence has been found during the investigation against the petitioner, therefore, the F.I.R. No. 115/2009 qua the petitioner deserves to be quashed and set aside in view of report submitted by the Investigating Agency.Consequently, the misc. petition stand allowed and the F.I.R. No. 115/2009 registered at Anti Corruption Bureau, Jaipur qua the petitioner is quashed and set aside. JUNE519 Petition allowed. *******