JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the petitioner-complainant and persued the record of the case. 2. Learned trial Judge while convicting the accused-respondents under Section 304 Part II has observed that there was no injury out 15 which can be said to have been caused on vital part of the body and according to the doctor, no injury was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death and had there been proper treatment, the deceased could have been saved. The accused were also 4 in number and nobody inflicted injury on the vital part, therefore, we are not inclined to grant this leave to appeal as well to entertain this revision petition. Accordingly, the leave to appeal filed by the State is refused and the revision petition filed by the complainant for enhancement of sentence is rejected.Leave to appeal refused and Revision petition dismissed. *******