JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that not only charges have been framed against the petitioner but statement of prosecutrix has also been recorded. In her statement, she stated that she remained with the accused for nearly 28 days and during that period she used to go in 'jungle' for natural calls but did not inform complain anyone, looking to the aforesaid, petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 4. After considering the rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that the petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is 5 accepted and I consider it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner namely, Rajjak Khan on bail under Section 439 Cr.PC. in FIR No. 87/2009 registered at Police Station - Kishangarhbas, Alwar for offence under Section/s 366-A, 368, 385, 376(2)(g) and 120-B IPC provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- together with one surety in the like o amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.Application for Bail Allowed. *******