1. On 29.4.2009 the maintainability of this revision petition was assailed seriously by the Learned counsel for the respondents 11 to 14 whereupon the Learned counsel for the petitioner was asked to satisfy this Tribunal that revision petition is maintainable. 2. Today counsel for the respondents 11 to 14 is absent. However, Ld. counsel for the petitioner has faintly argued that the revision petition before this Tribunal is not maintainable. 3. After going through the record, it is noticed that some order regarding correction of Girdawari was passed by Tehsildar Kishtwar in favour of petitioners under the Land Revenue Act. The said order was set aside by the erstwhile SDM Kishtawar against which the petitioner preferred 2nd appeal before the Divisional Commissioner, Jammu who declared the same as not maintainable on the ground that Agrarian Reforms Act is applicable to the present case and SDM had passed the order as Collector Agrarian Reforms. 4. The order of Divisional Commissioner Jammu was required to be challenged before the Financial Commissioner but instead the petitioner filed the present revision petition before this Tribunal which legally is not maintainable. Accordingly this revision petition is dismissed as not maintainable with liberty to the petitioner to approach the proper forum. File be consigned to record after due compilation.