JUDGMENT Hon’ble A.P. Sahi, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioners at length and Shri R.K. Tripathi holding brief of Shri P.D. Tripathi learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 and 6 and the learned Standing Counsel. 2. The argument is virtually to set aside the order dated 29.10.2009 on the ground that in fact the respondent No. 5 had been unable to prove her marriage and had not been able to indicate her date of marriage and therefore the domicile certificate which was submitted on the last date of the filing of the application forms should have been rejected. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the story of love marriage of the respondent No. 5 is sought to be supported by the documents but the same is being primarily considered on account of the background music played by the local M.L.A. of the area. He submits that there is no registration of the marriage of the respondent No. 5 and therefore the domicile issued on the strength thereof is equally invalid. 4. The impugned order recites that it appears that there was a love marriage of respondent No. 5 with Mr. Dharam Veer about which photographs were produced and an inquiry was conducted through the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, who was also satisfied that the said marriage had taken place. Not only this the ration card and other documents like the family register were also produced to establish the same. Merely because the domicile certificate was issued on the last date of filing of the application form would therefore not dislodge the factum of the marriage and even if that is so, the petitioners will have to approach the civil Court for a declaration of dissolution of such a marriage. The District Magistrate cannot annul a marriage, which has been otherwise accepted by a man and woman and prima facie evidence has been led to indicate that such a marriage had taken place. The respondent No. 5 is also a resident of the same village and after making an inquiry a domicile certificate was issued under the relevant Government Orders. 5. In such circumstances for the purposes of appointment of Shiksha Mitra sufficient time has been devoted by the District Magistrate to find out the truth and therefore no further time deserves to be devoted by this Court on the allegations made by the petitioners. 6. 5. In such circumstances for the purposes of appointment of Shiksha Mitra sufficient time has been devoted by the District Magistrate to find out the truth and therefore no further time deserves to be devoted by this Court on the allegations made by the petitioners. 6. The writ petition is dismissed. ————