Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2009 DIGILAW 530 (RAJ)

Sugna Devi v. State of Rajasthan

2009-02-18

DEO NARAYAN THANVI

body2009
JUDGMENT 1. - Heard. Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, learned Public Prosecutor takes notice on behalf of the State. 2. In the light of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in E. Michael Raj v. Intelligence Officer Narcotics Control Bureau, reported in 2008(2) WLC (SC) Cri. 265 : 2008 Cr.L.R. 401 wherein the punishment was altered by evaluating the quantity being commercial or below commercial because of the percentage of the Morphine, the rejection of the application under Section 91 Cr.PC. by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Sriganganagar filed by the petitioner for re- examination of the sample is contrary to the law. 3. Consequently, this misc. petition is allowed and trial court is directed to send the sample for re-examination in the light of the percentage of Morphine as discussed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case referred to above.Petition Allowed. *******