Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2009 DIGILAW 5376 (MAD)

Arunai Financiers Thiruvannamalai, Rep. by Partner Mani v. G. Subramani

2009-12-07

M.VENUGOPAL

body2009
Judgment Earlier this Court by its order dated 211. 2009 has directed the Registrar(Judicial), to call for the report from the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Thiruvannamalai as to whether the revision petitioner/tenant has deposited a sum of Rs.16,930/- on or before 30.4.2004 as per the order passed by this Court in C.R.P.NPD No.3924 of 2001 dated 4. 2004 and also to find out the present status of O.S.No.79 of 1994 on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Thiruvannamalai and to submit the said report within a week from now before this Court and that the report can be obtained and also it has been made clear that the said report can be obtained through fax and also by Special Messenger and further the matter has been directed to be posted on 12. 2009. 2. Accordingly, the Registrar(Judicial) has sent a communication dated 211. 2009 through fax to the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Thiruvannamalai in the matter in issue and the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Thiruvannamalai in his letter dated 30.11.2009 has informed the Registry that the revision petitioner has not deposited the sum of Rs.16,930/-as per the direction of the High Court, till this date etc. 3. Inasmuch as the earlier order passed by this Court in CRP.NO.3924 of 2001 on 4. 2004 itself is conditional one wherein it has been ordered as follows: "..... Civil revision petition would be allowed on deposit of Rs.16,930/-(rupees sixteen Thousand nine hundred and thirty only) by the petitioner on or before 30.4.2004 into the trial Court, namely, Principal Sub Court, Thiruvannamalai, failing which the revision petition shall stand dismissed . For compliance call on 16. 2004.Subject to the aforesaid direction, the civil revision petition is allowed". 4. As far as the present case is concerned, since the revision petitioner has not complied with the conditional order of this Court passed in CRP.No.3924 of 2001 dated 4. 2004, it is candidly clear that the said order itself has worked it out and nothing remains to be adjudicated in the review application and therefore, the same is disposed of without costs.