ORDER :- This writ petition is filed with a prayer to declare the action of the second respondent in not registering the documents presented in relation to the lands in Survey Nos.537/2, 3 and 4 of Bhogulu Village, Chintalapudi Mandal, West Godavari District, on the basis of a letter, dated 28.9.2007, issued by the third respondent, as illegal and arbitrary. A consequential direction is sought against the first respondent to receive and register the documents pertaining to the said lands. 2. The Government of A.P. issued a notification dated 29.1.1970, under Section 4 of the Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967 (for short "the Act"), proposing to notify an extent of 4,100 acres of land as 'Reserve Forest'. Objections were invited from various quarters. The predecessors in title of the petitioners claimed rights of ownership over an extent of about 350 acres of land in Survey Nos.537/2, 3 and 4 of Bhogolu Village. Their claims were examined and the Forest Settlement Officer (FSO), Nellore, passed an order, dated 18.12.1984, holding that the lands claimed by the petitioners are patta lands and that they cannot be declared as 'reserve forest'. He further directed that since the land is covered by the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (for short 'the F.C. Act'), necessary steps need to be taken with the Central Government, for deletion of the same from the proposed forest block 3. Sri Inuganti Ramakrishna Ranga Rao and 11 others filed W.P.No.11419 of 2006, before this Court, with a prayer to direct the Government of A.P. to make an application to the Government of India for exclusion of 342.50 acres of land situated at Bhogolu Village, from the purview of the F.C. Act. The writ petition was allowed through order, dated 19.1.2009. The petitioners claim to have purchased different extents of land in the said survey numbers, in the recent past. Their grievance is that the documents presented by them before the Sub-Registrar, Eluru, the second respondent, are not being processed, or entertained. 4. The petitioner contends that once the FSO is of the view that the land cannot be included under the reserve forest, the restrictions imposed under the A.P. Forest Act and the Forest Conservative Act do not apply and there is no justification for the second respondent in not receiving and passing the documents in relation to the land. 5. The respondents filed counter-affidavit. 5. The respondents filed counter-affidavit. The history in relation to the land, ever since it was proposed to be notified as reserved forest, is traced. It is submitted that the FSO himself took the view that though the land is held by way of private patta, it is forest and covered by the provisions of the F.C. Act and unless and until a permission of the Central Government is accorded, no transaction can take place in respect of the land. It is also their case that the final notification under Section 15 of the Act is yet to be issued and the prohibition contained under Section 7 of the Act, would operate. 6. Sri Posani Venkateswarlu, learned Counsel for the petitioners, submits that not only the FSO declared the lands to be outside the purview of the notification, but also this Court held in its judgment in W.P. No.11419 of 2006 that without the necessity of any further proceedings, the lands can be enjoyed by the pattadar. He submits that the sole basis for the third respondent in addressing the letter, dated 28.9.2007, to the second respondent 'was pendency of W.P. No.11419 of 2006 and once that has ended in favour of the petitioners, there is no impediment for the second respondent to register the documents. 7. Learned Government Pleader for Forests submits that the view expressed by the FSO was only limited to the nature of the land, namely whether it is patta land or Government land; so far as the character of the land is concerned, it was categorically held that, being a forest land, the provisions of F.C. Act apply. She further contends that once the land was subject-matter of the notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Act, the prohibition contained under Section 7 of the Act operates and the question of the petitioners purchasing the land, would arise only, when a notification under Section 15 of the Act is issued, taking the land from the purview of the proposals. 8. The petitioners do not deny the fact that the land admeasuring an extent 342.50 acres was notified under Section 4 of the Act for the purpose of declaring it as 'reserve forest'. This was followed by a notification under Section 6 of the Act. The FSO was appointed to determine the claims of various individuals vis-à-vis notified lands. 8. The petitioners do not deny the fact that the land admeasuring an extent 342.50 acres was notified under Section 4 of the Act for the purpose of declaring it as 'reserve forest'. This was followed by a notification under Section 6 of the Act. The FSO was appointed to determine the claims of various individuals vis-à-vis notified lands. On verification of the record, and on hearing the concerned parties, the FSO passed an order, 18.12.1984 holding that the land of 342.50 acres in survey Nos.537/2,3 and 4 of Bhogolu Village, does not belong to the Government That, however, does not bring an end to the controversy. At the end of the order, the FSO made the following observations: "As this area in question attracts the provision of the Forest Conservation Act 1980 of Government of India prior orders of the central Government have to be obtained for eliminating any land from the proposed block. Since the land in question with got sub-divided as per the entries in the land register maintained early on the year 1969 (i.e. 1.1.1969) and that too prior to the notification of this block under Section 4 of the A.P. Forest Act and since the claim of the petitioners is established beyond doubt during the enquiry conducted by the Forest Settlement Officer, Nellore necessary orders of the central Government may be obtained and communicated for eliminating the patta lands over an extent of 342.50 Acs. or 138.60 Hec. from the forest block by way of an award as shown in the sketch enclosed." Therefore, it becomes necessary for the parties to wait, for the clearance by the Central Government. 9. As a matter of fact, the petitioner filed W.P. No.11419 of 2006 with a specific prayer to direct the State Government to make an application to the Central Government seeking approval for exclusion of 342.50 acres of the land in survey Nos.537/2,3 and 4 of Bhogolu Village. The writ petition was allowed as prayed for through judgment dated 19.1.2009. Obviously, the petitioner has to wait, till the State Government makes recommendation for exclusion of the land with the Central Government, and the latter accords such permission. Inasmuch as the writ petition is allowed, the necessary steps need to be taken to get the directions implemented. 10. The writ petition was allowed as prayed for through judgment dated 19.1.2009. Obviously, the petitioner has to wait, till the State Government makes recommendation for exclusion of the land with the Central Government, and the latter accords such permission. Inasmuch as the writ petition is allowed, the necessary steps need to be taken to get the directions implemented. 10. Another aspect of the matter is that the proceedings initiated under the Act in respect of the land, did not reach finality. Notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Act were issued and enquiry was held under Section 10 of the Act. This, in turn, must lead to final notification under Section 15 of the Act. In such a notification, either the entire area notified under Section 4 of the Act, can be declared as reserved forest, or a specific part, or part or whole of it may be deleted. Till such an eventuality, the prohibition contained under Section 7 of the Act operates, which reads as under: "Bar of accrual of forest rights and prohibition of clearings:-(1) During the interval between the publication of a notification in the Andhra Pradesh Gazette under Section 4 and the date fixed by the notification under Section 15- (a) no right shall be acquired by any person in or over the land included in the notification under Section 4 except by succession or under a grant or contract in writing made or entered into by or on behalf of the Government or any person in whom such right was vested before the publication of the notification under Section 4; (b) no new house shall be built or plantation formed, no fresh clearing for cultivation or for any other purpose shall be made, on such land and no trees shall be cut from such land for the purpose of trade or manufacture: Provided that nothing shall prohibit the doing of any act specified in this clause with the permission in writing of the Settlement Officer; and (c) no person shall set fire or kindle or leave burning any fire in such manner as to endanger or damage such land or forest produce. (2) No patta in such land shall be granted by or on behalf of the Government." 11. (2) No patta in such land shall be granted by or on behalf of the Government." 11. Admittedly no notification under Section 15 of the Act was issued, nor the Central Government had accorded its permission under the F.C. Act, the second respondent cannot be expected to register the sale deeds. The petitioners have to await the steps mentioned above. 12. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioners to prosecute further remedies as regards issuance of final notification, or for orders from the Central Government exempting the land from the provisions of the F.C. Act, as per law. There shall be no order as to costs.