Judgment The four petitioners filed O.A.Nos. 5757 to 5760 of 1997. On abolition of the Tamil nadu Administrative Tribunal, the matter stood transferred to this Court and was renumbered as W.P.Nos.30606 to 30609 of 2006. 2. The grievance of the petitioners was that they were working as N.M.R. Drivers in the third respondent Aranthangi Municipality and four posts of regular Drivers have been sanctioned by proceedings dated 25. 1997 issued by the Director of Municipal Administration. In view of those sanctioned posts, they should be absorbed against the said posts. 3. Under section 74 of the District Municipalities Act 1920, the power to frame service regulations in respect of the Municipal staff vests with the Municipal Council. Under section 75 of the Act, the power to pay those staff vests only with the Municipal Council. Even appointing authority to make an appointment is the Municipal Council. 4. It is not clear as to how the petitioners could have approached the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal with the grievance which they have projected in the Original Applications, when the Tribunal has no power in the absence of any notification with reference to the dealing with the employees working in the Municipalities. Under section 15(3) of the Administrative Tribunals Act 1985, unless there is a specific notification covering any Local or other Authority or Corporation, the Tribunal does not get any automatic jurisdiction over the municipal employees. Under section 77 of the District Municipalities Act 1920 by amendment made by Tamil Nadu Act 65 of 1986 with effect from 6. 1986, it is only the Teachers, other officers and servants of the Municipal Council employees in connection with the Municipal Schools will become the whole time employees of the State Government and therefore, it is in their cases, the Tribunal might have jurisdiction but not in the case of others. Further there is no automatic right for a N.M.R. employee to be considered in the absence of enabling provision under the Rules framed by the respective Municipal Council. 5. Since these matters have been transferred to this Court and even if the Original Applications are treated as Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, there is a jurisdiction vested on this Court to deal with the subject matter raised in the writ petitions. 5. Since these matters have been transferred to this Court and even if the Original Applications are treated as Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, there is a jurisdiction vested on this Court to deal with the subject matter raised in the writ petitions. The fundamental question whether employee employed as a N.M.R. has as a matter of right to get a regular post of Driver, is highly doubtful. In the absence of any enforceable right on the part of the petitioners, the writ petitions are misconceived and accordingly all the four Writ Petitions are dismissed. No costs.