Judgment pUnz] lnL;-&izkFkhZ us ;g utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 229 jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e 1955 ds rgr blh U;k;ky; dh ,dyihB ds ekuuh; lnL; Jh ,l-lh- 'kekZ }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 23-3-2005 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr fd;k gSA 2- vkyksP; fu.kZ;kuqlkj fo}ku lnL; us nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds fu.kZ;ksa esa fdlh izdkj dh {ks=kf/kdkj lEcU/kh =qfV ugh ikrs gq, ,oa leofrZiw.kZ fu"d"kksZ ds lkFk ikfjr fu.kZ;ksa esa gLr{ksi dk vkSfpR; ugh le>rs gq, fuxjkuh dks [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA 3- eSaus utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= ij ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dh cgl utjlkuh dh xzg.krk ij /;kuiwoZd lquh rFkk vkyksP; fu.kZ; ,oa utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= esa mYysf[kr vk{ksiksa dk Hkh /;kuiwoZd v/;;u ,oa euu fd;k x;kA 4- eSa loZizFke fdlh Hkh ekeys esa iqufoZyksdu djus ls lEcfU/kr dkuwu dk mYys[k djuk mfpr le>rk gWwA bl laca/k esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us lqjsUnzdqekj odhy cuke phQ ,XthD;wfVo vkfQly e/; izns'k 2005¼1½ vkj-vkj-Vh- ist 545 ds fofu.kZ; esa izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd& "A point that has been heard and decided cannot form a ground for review even if assuming that the view taken in the judgment under review is erroneous." dUgS;kyky lSuh cuke LVsV vkQ jktLFkku 2005 vkj-ch-ts- ¼12½ ist 290 esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd& "The scope of review is very limited. It has been clearly held in a catena of cases that a judgment/order may be open to review u/O. 47 R. 1 CPC if there is a mistake or an error apparent on the face of record. An error which is not self evident and has to be detected by the process of reasoning can hardly be said to be an error apparent on the face o f record justifying exercise of power of review. In exercise of jurisdiction u/O. 47 R.1 CPC, it is not permissible for an erroneous decision to be re-heard and corrected. There is clearly distinction between 'an erroneous decision' and 'an error apparent on the face of record'. While the former can be corrected by higher forum, the latter can be corrected by exercise of review jurisdiction. In exercise of jurisdiction u/O. 47 R.1 CPC, it is not permissible for an erroneous decision to be re-heard and corrected. There is clearly distinction between 'an erroneous decision' and 'an error apparent on the face of record'. While the former can be corrected by higher forum, the latter can be corrected by exercise of review jurisdiction. A review petition has, therefore, a limited purpose and cannot be allowed to be an appeal in disguise." 4- mijksDr ewyHkwr fl)kUrksa dks e/;utj j[krs gq, tc eSaus nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds vkyksP; fu.kZ;ksa ds lkFk lkFk bl U;k;ky; ds lEekuh; lnL; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 23-3-2005 dk v/;;u fd;k gS rks eSa ikrk gWw fd izkFkhZ dh vksj ls bl utjlkuh esa mBk;h xbZ vkifRr;ksa ds lEcU/k esa ekuuh; lnL; }kjk fopkj dj nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds fu.kZ;ksa esa fdlh izdkj dh dkuwuh =qfV gksuk ugh ekuk gSA esjs er esa Hkh bl U;k;ky; ds vkyksP; fu.kZ; fnukad 23-3-2005 esa ,slh dksbZ tkfgj =qfV "error apparent on the face of the record" gksuk izrhr ugh gksrk gS ftl dkj.k ls eSa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr utjlkuh esa dksbZ cy ugh ikrk gwW vkSj bl dkj.k ls utjlkuh dks xzg.k fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugh le>rk gWwA 5- ifj.kker% izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= dks xzg.krk dh LVst ij gh vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA fu.kZ; fy[kk;k tkdj lquk;k x;kA