ORDER 10.11.2009 — Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-employer, opposite parties 1 to 3 claimants and opposite party no.4 ESI Corporation are present. Heard. In this writ application the petitioner has assailed the order dated 14.7.2008 at Annexure-4 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation-cum-Deputy Labour Commission, Cuttack in W.C. Case No. 137-D/2005 rejecting petitioner’s application under Order 9 Rule 13 read with Section 151 C.P.C. to set aside ex parte judgment dated 12.2.2008. The impugned order reads as follows : “xxx xxx xxx Advocate for the applicant as well as O.P.No.1 are present. Advocate for the applicant filed written objection to the peti¬tion dated 9.6.2008 filed by O.P.No.1. Heard. After careful consideration of the petition as well as objection, I am not inclined to accept the petition dt. 9.6.08 since the judgment has already been passed as per order dt. 12.2.08. Further, I have no jurisdiction to consider the same. Hence rejected. Direct the O.P. no.1 to deposit the award amount of compensation immedi¬ately in this Court within one month from receipt of this Order. xxx xxx xxx”. Obviously the only ground assigned by the learned Commis¬sioner for rejecting petitioner’s application under Order 9, Rule 13 C.P.C. appears to be on the basis of the observation that he has no jurisdiction to consider the application. However, as has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner, Rule 41 of the Workmen’s Compensation Rules, 1924 provides that provi¬sions under Order 9 shall apply to the proceeding before the Commissioner. Therefore, in passing the impugned order learned Commissioner has illegally failed to exercise jurisdiction vested on him. Therefore, the matter has to be remanded back to the Commissioner for disposal of the application under Order 9 Rule 13 C.P.C. on merit. Accordingly, the writ application is allowed. Order dated 14.7.2008 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation-cum-Deputy Labour Commissioner, Cuttack in W.C. Case No. 137-D/2005 is set aside. The matter is remanded to the learned Com¬missioner with a direction to consider and dispose of the appli¬cation under Order 9 Rule 13 read with Section 151 C.P.C. filed by the petitioner afresh. Parties are directed to appear before the Commissioner on 7.12.2009 on which date the learned Commis¬sioner shall fix a date for hearing on the petition so as to pass final order on the application under Order 9 Rule 13 C.P.C. within two months thereafter. Parties are directed to appear before the Commissioner on 7.12.2009 on which date the learned Commis¬sioner shall fix a date for hearing on the petition so as to pass final order on the application under Order 9 Rule 13 C.P.C. within two months thereafter. Urgent certified copy of the order be granted on proper application. Application allowed.