Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2009 DIGILAW 935 (RAJ)

Mohd. Mushtaq v. Peeru

2009-04-01

PAWAN CHANDRA

body2009
ih- pUnz] lnL;-&;g vihy vfrfjDr lEHkkxh; vk;qDr dksVk ds fu.kZ; fnukad 16-6-06 ds fo:) jktLFkku Hkw jktLo vf/kfu;e 1956 ¼la{ksi esa vf/kfu;e½ dh /kkjk 76 ds vUrxZr izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd rglhynkj ykMiqjk us vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 136 ds vUrxZr bUnzkt nq:Lrh gsrq ,d vkosnu i= ftyk dysDVj dksVk ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dj fuosnu fd;k fd xzke y[kkok dh lkfcd [kljk uEcj 202 dh 19 ch?kk 8 fcLok Hkwfe] [kljk uEcj 203 dh 9 ch?kk 10 fcLok Hkwfe ,oa [kljk uEcj 204 dh 38 ch?kk 8 fcLok Hkwfe flokp pd ljdkj ntZ FkhA Hkw izcU/k foHkkx }kjk Hkw izcU/k dk;Zokgh ds nkSjku mDr Hkwfe ds u;s [kljk uEcj 323 jdck 0-47 gS-] [kljk uEcj 324 jdck 0-73 gS-] [kljk uEcj 325 jdck 1-03 gS- dqy fdrk 3 jdck 2-23 gS- dk;e dj vukf/kd`r :i ls izR;FkhZ la[;k 1 ih: iq= Jh vgen [kkW dkSe eqlyeku ds uke ntZ dj nh ftls nq:Lr fd;k tkosA ftyk dysDVj dksVk us vius vkns'k fnukad 25-2-03 ls mDr Hkwfe flokp pd ntZ djus ds vkns'k fn;sA blls O;fFkr gksdj vihykFkhZ us izFke vihy vfrfjDr lEHkkxh; vk;qDr dksVk ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dh ftUgksaus mHk; i{k dks lqudj vius fu.kZ; fn- 16-6-06 ls vihy [kkfjt dj nhA blls O;fFkr gksdj ;g f}rh; vihy e.My ds le{k is'k dh xbZ gSA 3- mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl lquh xbZA 4- vihykFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us vihy eheksa esa vafdr rF;ksa dks gh cgl ds nkSjku nksgjkrs gq, vihy Lohdkj djus dk fuosnu fd;k vkSj vius i{k ds leFkZu esa U;kf;d n`"Vkr vkjvkjMh 1991 ist 164 HkkxhjFk cuke ghjkyky] vkjvkjMh 1992 ist 17] jkedqekj cuke LVsV vkWQ jktLFkku] vkjvkjMh 1992 ist 117 :nk cuke ukFkw o vU; vkjvkjMh 1989 ist 45 ykew jke cuke LVsV vkQ jktLFkku] vkjvkjMh 2003 ist 70 Jherh fcj/kh o vU; cuke cksMZ vkQ jsosU;w o vU; is'k fd;sA blds foijhr fo}ku mi jktdh; vfHkHkk"kd us vihyk/khu vkns'k dks fof/klEer crkrs gq, vihy [kkfjt djus dk fuosnu fd;kA 5- geus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl ij euu fd;k ,oa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dh i=koyh dk vk|ksikUr voyksdu fd;k ,oa izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dk xaHkhjrk ls v/;;u fd;kA 6- ;ksX; vf/koDrk vihykFkhZx.k dk rdZ gS fd muds i{kdkjku }kjk oknxzLr vkjkth dks jftLVMZ foØ; i= ls [kjhn fy;k Fkk ftldk ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 182 fnukad 1-3-99 dks Lohd`r Hkh gks pqdk Fkk fQj Hkh v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa }kjk mUgsa vko';d i{kdkj ugha cukrs gq, lquokbZ dk volj iznku fd;s cxSj vkyksP; vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gSA mijksDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa mUgksaus nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds fu.kZ;ksa dks =qfViw.kZ crkrs gq, vihy dks Lohdkj djus dh izkFkZuk dh gSA 7- blds foijhr foi{khx.k ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk us vkyksP; vkns'k dks fof/klEer crk;k gSA 8- eSaus nksuksa i{kksa ds ;ksX; vf/koDrkx.k ds rdksZ dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa dh i=koyh esa miyC/k lk{; dk ckjhdh ls v/;;u ,oa ewY;kadu fd;k gSA 9- bl lEcU/k esa eSa ikrk gwa fd izR;FkhZ la[;k 2 jktLFkku jkT; dh vksj ls rglhynkj ykMiqjk us ftyk dysDVj dksVk ds le{k bl vk'k; dk izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k Fkk fd Hkw izcU/k ls iwoZ xzke y[kkok dh fooknxzLr Hkwfe [kljk uEcj 202 jdck 19 ch?kk 8 fcLok] 203 jdck 9 ch?kk 10 fcLok] 204 jdck 38 ch?kk 8 fcLok [kkrs ljdkj flok; pd ntZ Fkh ijUrq Hkw izcU/k foHkkx }kjk blds u;s [kljk uEcj 323 jdck 0-47 gS-] [kljk uEcj 324 jdck 0-73 gS-] [kljk uEcj 325 jdck 0-03 gS- dqy jdck 2-23 gS- izR;FkhZ ih: iq= vgen [kka eqlyeku ds [kkrs ntZ dj nh gSA vr% mDr =qfV dks nq:Lr fd;k tkdj fooknxzLr vkjkth dks flok; pd Hkwfe fdLe catM ntZ fd;k tkosA 10- mijksDr izkFkZuk i= ij ftyk dysDVj us ih: iq= vgen [kka dks uksfVl tkjh fd;s ijUrq ckotwn lwpuk ds og mifLFkr ugha vk;kA bl ij mUgksaus jsdkMZ dk v/;;u dj mYysf[kr fd;k gS fd& ^^xzke y[kkok esa laor 2034 ls 2037 dh tekcUnh ds vuqlkj Hkwfe [kljk uEcj 202 jdck 19 ch?kk 8 fcLok] [kljk uEcj 203 jdck 9 ch?kk 10 fcLok] [kljk uEcj 204 jdck 38 ch?kk 8 fcLok [kkrk la[;k 1 esa ljdkjh tehu esa [kkrk fefYd;r ljdkj esa catM esa jktLo jsdkMZ ds vuqlkj ntZ FkhA ;kfu jktdh; flok; pd Hkwfe FkhA Hkw izcU/k lafØ;k ds nkSjku bl vkjkth ds u;s [kljk uEcj 323 jdck 0-47 gS- [kljk uEcj 324 jdck 0-73 gS-] [kljk uEcj 325 jdck 1-03 gS-] dqy 2-23 gS- dk;e dj Hkwfe fcuk fdlh vf/kdkj ds vkSj vk/kkj ds ih: iq= vgen [kka vizkFkhZ ds lEor~ 2038 ls 2057 dh [krkSuh esa ntZ dj nh xbZ gSA [kljk fxjnkojh xzke y[kkok tkxhj lEor 2034 ls 2037 esa Hkwfe [kljk uEcj 202] 203 o 204 flok; pd yxkuh ntZ Fkh ftlesa vizkFkhZ [kljk uEcj 202 o 203 ij vfrØeh dh gSfl;r ls dqN fgLls ij dkfct Fkk tks Hkw izcU/k foHkkx }kjk fdlh fcuk oS/k vf/kdkj o vkns'k ds vizkFkhZ dks vuko';d ykHk igqapkrs gq, mDr vkjkth mlds [kkrs esa ntZ dj =qfViw.kZ bUnzktkr jktLo jsdkMZ esa ntZ dj fn;s x;sA =qfViw.kZ bUnzkt ds lq/kkj djus dk izko/kku jktLFkku Hkwfe jktLo vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 136 esa fd;k x;k gS ,slh =qfV ds lq/kkj djus dh vf/kdkfjrk Land Record Officer dh curh gSA Land Record Officer ds vfrfjDr vU; fdlh vf/kdkjh dks lsfVyes.V ds nkSjku gq, =qfViw.kZ bUnzktkr dks lq/kkj djus dh vf/kdkfjrk ugha nh xbZ gSA** 11- ;ksX; ftyk dysDVj us vius fu.kZ; esa ,vkbZvkj 1989 ,llh 1582 ij Nis gq, fu.kZ; The Marathwada University vs. Seshrao Balwant Rao Chavan ds fuEu va'k Hkh mYysf[kr fd;s gS& The Statutory authority cannot travel beyond the power conferred and any action with out power has no legal validity. It is ab initio void and can not be ratified. blh izdkj ls mUgksaus ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk fofHkUu fofu.kZ;ksa esa izfrikfnr fuEu fl)kUr dks Hkh m)fjr fd;k gS& "A void order is not est in the eyes of law. It needs no declaration to set aside. Hence, the legal position that boils down from such void orders is that no order is now in force and a void order has no effect in the eye of law. They shall be treated null and void and as if never issued or have taken any legal effect. 12- vihykFkhZx.k dh vksj ls tks vkifRr;ka orZeku f}rh; vihy esa izLrqr dh xbZ gS] mu vkifRr;ksa dks mUgksuas ;ksX; vfrfjDr lEHkkxh; vk;qDr dksVk ds le{k Hkh mRiUu dh Fkh vkSj mUgksaus vihykFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr dh xbZ lHkh vkifRrksa ij fopkj dj fo}ku ftyk dysDVj ds fu.kZ; dks fof/klEer ekuk gSA 13- esjs er esa Hkh nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds vkyksP; fu.kZ; rdZ laxr ,oa fof/k lEer rFkk jsdkMZ ,oa nLrkostkr ij vk/kkfjr fu.kZ; gS ftuesa fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ dkuwuh =qfV fo|eku gksuk izrhr ugha gksrk gS u gh ,sls fof/k lEer fu.kZ;ksa esa gLr{ksi djus ds dksbZ U;k; laxr vk/kkj fn[kkbZ iM+rs gSA 14- eSa ;gka ;g Hkh mYys[k dj nsuk mfpr le>rk gwa fd bl U;k;ky; }kjk ,oa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk vusd fofu.kZ;ksa esa bl vk'k; dk lqLFkkfir fl)kUr izfrikfnr dj j[kk gS fd Hkw izcU/k foHkkx dks jktLo jsdkMZ esa fcuk fdlh l{ke U;k;ky; ds vkns'k ds bUnzkt ifjorZu djus dk vf/kdkj izkIr ugha gSA og iqjkus bUnzktkr dks gh nksgjk ldrs gSA bl lEcU/k esa e.My ,oa mPp U;k;ky;ksa }kjk ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd& 2008¼1½ vkjvkjVh ist 151 xhxk jke o vU; cuke cksMZ vkWQ jsosU;w o vU; esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd& Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 - Sec. 88 - Suit for declaration - Petitioners declared khatedar tenant of Kh. No. 734-RAA reversed the judgment & upheld by BOR-Settlement Department had no right to change the existing entries even admitting the possession of father respondent No. 4 - Respondent No. 4 should have filed an independent suit - Held RAA & Board were not justified in reversing the judgment & decree. No. 734-RAA reversed the judgment & upheld by BOR-Settlement Department had no right to change the existing entries even admitting the possession of father respondent No. 4 - Respondent No. 4 should have filed an independent suit - Held RAA & Board were not justified in reversing the judgment & decree. 2007¼1½ vkjvkjVh 27 jkeiky o vU; cuke jk/ks';ke esa e.My dh ,dy ihB us ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd& Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 - Sec. 212 - Temporary injunction - Settlement department attested the mutation though department has nor night to change the entries - Petitioner was recorded as khatedar in jamabandi of Svt. 2023 to 2026-Attestation of mutation by settlement department is without jurisdiction & ab initio void - Held, Mutation No. 729 is set aside & declared void. vkjchts ¼10½ 2003 ist 118 :iukjk;.k cuke dtksMey esa jktLo e.My dh ,dy ihB us ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd& Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 - Section 136-Settlement Authorities have no power to delete the original entries and make new entries - In the case during the settlement operations, Assistant Settlement Officer deleted the name of the applicant who is a recorded khatedar of the disputed land and made entries in the name of non applicants, whereas settlement authorities have no right to delete the original entry and made new entries without any order of the competent Court. Revision accepted. 15- mijksDr lEiw.kZ foospu ds vk/kkj ij eSa nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds leorhZ fu.kZ;ksa esa dksbZ dkuwuh =qfV fo|eku gksuk ugha ekurk gwa u gh bl f}rh; vihy esa mBk;s x;s vk{ksiksa esa dksbZ cy gksuk ekurk gwa vkSj bl vk/kkj ij vihy dks Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha le>rk gwaA 16- ifj.kkeLo:i vihykFkhZ }kjk izLrqr vihy [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA 17- rglhynkj ykMiqjk ls vis{kk dh tkrh gS fd og nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds fu.kZ;ksa dh ikyuk lqfuf'pr djsaxs rFkk ;fn oknxzLr vkjkth dk dCtk vU; fdlh ds ikl gS rks mls fu;ekuqlkj csn[ky dj dCtk jkT; ds i{k esa izkIr dj dk;Zokgh dk mYys[k jktLo jsdkMZ esa djsasxsA 18- fu.kZ; dh izfr ds lkFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk vfHkys[k rqjUr ykSVk;k tkosA fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA