ih- pUnz] lnL;-&izkFkhZx.k us ;g utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 229 jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e 1955 ds rgr v/kksgLrk{kjdrkZ fu.kZ; fnukad 18-11-2008 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr fd;k gSA 2- vkyksP; fu.kZ;kuqlkj fuxjkuh dks Lohdkj dj nksuksa i{kksa dks fookfnr vkjkth ls /kkjk 175 ¼4­,½ ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj csn[ky dj vkjkth dks dCts jkt ysdj flok;pd ?kksf"kr djus dk vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gSA 3- eSaus utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= ij ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dh cgl utjlkuh dh xzg.krk ij /;kuiwoZd lquh rFkk vkyksP; fu.kZ; ,oa utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= esa mYysf[kr vk{ksiksa dk Hkh /;kuiwoZd v/;;u ,oa euu fd;k x;kA 4- eSa loZizFke fdlh Hkh ekeys ds iqufoZyksdu djus ls lEcfU/kr dkuwu dk mYys[k djuk mfpr le>rk gwaA bl lEcU/k esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us lqjsUnzdqekj odhy cuke phQ ,T;wD;qfVo vkfQlj e/; izns'k 2005 ¼1½ vkjvkjVh ist 545 ds fofu.kZ; esa izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd& "A point that has been heard and decided cannot form a ground for review even if assuming that the view taken in the judgment under review is erroneous." dUgS;kyky lSuh cuke LVsV vkWQ jktLFkku 2005 vkjchts ¼12½ ist 290 esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd& "The scope of review is very limited. It has been clearly held in a catena of cases that a judgment/order may be open to review u/O. 47 R.I. CPC if there is a mistake or an error apparent on the face of record. An error which is not self evidence and has to be detected by the process of reasoning can hardly be said to be an error apparent on the face of record justifying exercise of power of review. In exercise of jurisdiction u/O. 47 R. 1 CPC, it is not permissible for an erroneous decision to be re0heard and corrected. There is clearly distinction between 'an erroneous decision' and 'an error apparent on the face of record.' While the former can be corrected by higher forum, the latter can be corrected by exercise of review jurisdiction. In exercise of jurisdiction u/O. 47 R. 1 CPC, it is not permissible for an erroneous decision to be re0heard and corrected. There is clearly distinction between 'an erroneous decision' and 'an error apparent on the face of record.' While the former can be corrected by higher forum, the latter can be corrected by exercise of review jurisdiction. A review petition has, therefore, a limited purpose and cannot be allowed to be an appeal in disguise." 5- mijksDr ewyHkwr fl)kUrksa dks e/;utj j[krs gq, tc eSaus utjlkuh Kkiu esa mYysf[kr vfHkopuksa ,oa bl U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 18-11-08 dk v/;;u fd;k gS rks eSa ikrk gwa fd bl ekeys esa vizkfFkZ;k deyk ckbZ ds firk eaxyk tks fd vuqlwfpr tkfr dk O;fDr Fkk] us laKku xSj vuqlwfpr tu tkfr ds O;fDr dks fookfnr Hkwfe dk Ø; foØ; fd;k gS] mudk ;g d`R; /kkjk 42¼ch½ jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e ds vkKkRed izko/kkuksa ds foijhr gS vkSj blh vk/kkj ij rglhynkj euksgjFkkuk >kykokM+ us muds fu.kZ; fnukad 20-9-2000 ls izkFkhZx.k ij 'kkfLr vf/kjksfir djrs gq, csn[kyh dk fu.kZ; fn;k Fkk ftl fu.kZ; dh iqf"V bl U;k;ky; us vkyksP; fu.kZ; esa dh gSA esjs Li"V er esa bl U;k;ky; ds vkyksP; fu.kZ; esa fdlh izdkj dh tkfgjk =qfV "error apparent on the face of the record" gksuk izrhr ugha gksrk gSA blds vykok Hkh mijksDr mYysf[kr fofu.kZ;ksa esa izfrikfnr fl)kUrksa ds vk/kkj ij fcuk fdlh tkfgjk =qfV ds vius iwoZ ds erksa ds foijhr u;s er dks lCLVhV;wV ¼Substitute½ ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA ftl dkj.k ls eSa izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr utjlkuh esa dksbZ cy gksuk ugha ekurs gq, bls xzg.k fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha le>rk gwa vkSj bl Lrj ij gh [kkfjt fd;s tkus ;ksX; le>rk gwaA 6- ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= dks xzg.krk dh LVst ij gh vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA fu.kZ; fy[kk;k tkdj lquk;k x;kA