ih- pUnz] lnL;-&;g fuxjkuh vfrfjDr lEHkkxh; vk;qDr dksVk ds fu.kZ; fnukad 4-8-06 ds fo:) jktLFkku Hkw jktLo vf/kfu;e 1956 ¼la{ksi esa vf/kfu;e½ dh /kkjk 84 ds vUrxZr izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd xzke uheksyk rglhy ihiYnk esa Jh dtksM iq= pUnk tkfr dkNh ds [kkrs esa 21 ch?kk 17 fcLok Hkwfe ntZ FkhA dtksM dh e`R;q ds ckn fojklr dk ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 281 xzke fueksyk Jherh ;e daojh csck dtksM ds uke ntZ gqvk rFkk Jherh jkedaojh dh e`R;q ds ckn ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 356 ls jftLVMZ xksnukesa ds vk/kkj ij Jh ?ku';ke eqrcUuk Jh dtksM ds uke ntZ fd;k x;kA ftldh vihy vfrfjDr ftyk dysDVj dksVk ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dh xbZ ftUgksaus vius fu.kZ; fnukad 29-3-06 ds }kjk vihy Lohdkj djrs gq, ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 356 fujLr djrs gq, izdj.k rglhynkj ihiYnk dks iqu% lquokbZ gsrq izfrizsf"kr dj fn;kA blls O;fFkr gksdj vizkFkhZ us vfrfjDr lEHkkxh; vk;qDr dksVk ds U;k;ky; esa vihy nk;j dh ftUgksaus vius fu.kZ; fnukad 4-8-06 ds }kjk vihy Lohdkj dj vfrfjDr ftyk dysDVj dksVk }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; dks fujLr djrs gq, ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 356 dks cgky j[kkA blls O;fFkr gksdj ;g fuxjkuh e.My ds le{k is'k dh xbZ gSA 3- mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl lquh xbZA 4- izkFkhZx.k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa fuxjkuh eheksa esa vafdr rF;ksa dks nksgjkrs gq;s fuxjkuh Lohdkj djus dk fuosnu fd;kA blds foijhr vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us fuxjk/khu fu.kZ; dks fof/klEer crkrs gq, fuxjkuh [kkfjt djus dk fuosnu fd;k vkSj vius i{k ds leFkZu esa U;kf;d n`"VkUr vkjvkjMh 1993 ist 88 dsoy o vU; cuke xEHkhj flag] vkjvkjMh 2009 ist 150 LVsV vkQ jktLFkku cuke nkW[kk ckbZ] vkjvkjMh 2009 ist 158 jkec[l cuke Hkaoj yky o vU;] vkjchts ¼15½ 2008 ist 674] Hkjrjke cuke Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh o vU;] vkjchts ¼11½ 2004 ist 327 lUrdaoj o vU; cuke cksMZ vkWQ jsosU;w] vkjchts ¼11½ 2004 ist 535 vknj flag cuke lqjtk jke] vkjvkjMh 1999 ist 25 is'k fd;sA 5- geus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl ij euu fd;k ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k rFkk izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dk Hkh llEeku ckjhdh ls v/;;u fd;kA 6- bl izdj.k esa loZizFke ge fe;kn ds fcUnq ij viuk er O;Dr djuk mfpr le>rs gSA vfrfjDr ftyk dysDVj dksVk us izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr bUrdky la[;k 356 fnukad 13-12-80 dh vihy dks 25 o"kZ ckn vUnj fe;kn ekurs gq, vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gS tcfd vfrfjDr ftyk dysDVj ds le{k ;g nLrkost jsdkMZ ij Fkk fd vizkFkhZ }kjk U;k;ky; mi[k.M vf/kdkjh dksVk esa okn la[;k 46@86 izkFkhZ la[;k 2 nsoh yky ,oa mlds HkkbZ ekaxhyky ds fo:) izLrqr gqvk Fkk vkSj og okn fnukad 31-8-87 dks vizkFkhZ ds i{k esa fMØh fd;k x;k gS vkSj ml okn esa bUrdky la[;k 356 dk Hkh gokyk FkkA ,slh fLFkfr esa lEiw.kZ nLrkost jsdkMZ ij gksrs gq, Hkh izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr vihy dks vUnj fe;kn ekuus esa fo}ku vfrfjDr ftyk dysDVj us fof/kd Hkwy dh gSA 7- loZizFke ge ;gka ;g mYys[k dj nsuk mfpr le>rs gS fd vihy@fuxjkuh dks izLrqr djus esa gqbZ nsjh dks fe;kn esa d.Mksu fdu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa fd;k tk ldrk gSA bl lEcU/k esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ,oa lHkh ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky;ksa us vusdkusd izdj.kksa esa bl vk'k; dk ewyHkwr fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd ftl i{kdkj }kjk vihy@fuxjkuh dks izLrqr djus esa nsjh dh x;h gS mlds }kjk nsjh ds lEcU/k esa fo'oluh;] i;kZIr ,oa lUrks"ktud dkj.k crk;s tkuk vko';d gSA ekuuh; U;k;ky;ksa us ;g Hkh er O;Dr fd;k gS fd jkT; ljdkj gksa ;k futh i{kdkj gks] nksuksa ds vf/kdkj leku gS vkSj nksuksa gh i{kksa dks vihy@fuxjkuh esa dh x;h nsjh dks d.Mksu djkus gsrq i;kZIr] fo'oluh; ,oa lUrks"ktud dkj.k crkus vko';d gSA U;w bf.M;k ba';ksjsUl dEiuh fyfeVsM cuke Jh dslj o vU; 1995¼2½ vkj,yvkj ist 585 ds fofu'p; esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ist 585 ds fofu'p; esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds fofu.kZ; ,vkbZvkj 1987 lqfize dksVZ ist 1353 dks m)fjr djrs gq, fuEu er O;Dr fd;k x;k gS& "If the delay is to be condoned mechanically on the ground of administrative exigencies, then in almost all cases the Court has to condone the delay. That is never the intention of the Supreme Court while laying down the law of condoning the delay in the ground of administrative exigencies." 1996¼1½ vkj,yvkj ist 714 esa ekuuh; U;k;ky; us fuEu vk'k; dk fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gSA "It is settled law that if an appeal is not presented with the period of limitation, it creates a right in favour of respondent and, therefore, when that right is subjected to be negated, it should not be based on reasonable grounds. A party seeking condonation of delay in filing appeal beyond the period of limitation must satisfy the Court that there was sufficient cause for not preferrring the appeal within the period of limitation. In that regard, much differentation would not be made between the Govt. or a private party. Considering the varicty of activities Govt. is engaged ad the ultimate sufferer on account of dismissal of appeal being the public, there may be difference of degree of proof required by the Govt. and the private party to establish sufficient cause but that would not or cannot relieve the Govt. from alleging and proving sufficient cause for delay. The Govt. is not required to give reasons and proving for each day's delay but has to allege and prove overall cause for the entire period. The Govt. cannot get over the delay simply because it is Govt. bonafide steps taken by the officer of the Govt. in filing the appeal is if stalled by the procedural rigmarole, inter-departmental wrangling or time taken for decision making would constitute a sufficient cause for condonation of delay. But if there is utter lack of sense of responsibility, derelication of duty, failure to decide priorities and deliberate inaction on the part of the Govt. Servant, procedural delays could not be ground for condonation of delay. In such a case, Govt. would be well adivsed to take proper steps against the erring officer but that would not constitute a sufficient cause. In the present case, there is complete lack of material pariticulars as to why the delay has been caused. Servant, procedural delays could not be ground for condonation of delay. In such a case, Govt. would be well adivsed to take proper steps against the erring officer but that would not constitute a sufficient cause. In the present case, there is complete lack of material pariticulars as to why the delay has been caused. A bald statement that there was delay in granting sanction would not constitute a ground for condonation of delay." ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; vkjchts ¼9½ 2002 ist 193 fpjath yky cuke vfrfjDr dysDVj t;iqj o vU; esa ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd& LIMITATION ACT 1963-ARTICLE 137; Applicability- Article 137 applies to those application for which no period of limitation has been provided elsewhere - Prescribed period is three years. 8- ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us ,vkbZvkj 1977 ,llh 282 dks Qksyks djrs gq, fuxjkuh izLrqr djus dh vf/kdre rhu o"kZ dh le; lhek fu/kkZfjr dh gSA 9- fo}ku vfrfjDr ftyk dysDVj dksVk dks loZizFke fe;kn ds fcUnq ij viuk fu.kZ; ikfjr djuk pkfg;s Fkk vkSj mlds ckn ;fn os fe;kn vof/k dks {kek djrs rks ckn esa vihy dks xq.kkoxq.k ds vk/kkj ij r; djuk pkfg;s FkkA vr% /kkjk 5 fe;kn vf/kfu;e ds izkFkZuk i= ij fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;s fcuk xq.kkoxq.k ij vihy dk fu.kZ; djus esa v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us fof/kd =qfV dh gSA ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us jkedyh nsoh cuke eSustj iatkc us'kuy cSad 'kkgckn o vU; TksVh 1998 ¼8½ ,llh 529 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd& "Constitution - Article 136 - Dismissal of appeal on ground of limitation - High Court considering case on merits - No reasons for condonation of delay. Held that merits of case can not be looked at without condoing delay. Held that merits of case can not be looked at without condoing delay. Appeal allowed and matter remanded for fresh decision on all points, including limitation." 10- ;gka ;g mYys[kuh; gS fd Jh ?ku';ke iq= Jh dtksM cuke Jh ekaxhyky o Jh nsohyky iq= Jh dY;k.k ds chp /kkjk 188 jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr ,d fu;fer okn mi[k.M vf/kdkjh dksVk ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;k x;k Fkk ftldk fu.kZ; mi[k.M vf/kdkjh dksVk }kjk fnukad 31-8-87 dks Jh ?ku';ke ds i{k esa fMØh fd;k x;k Fkk vkSj bl fu;fer okn esa ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 356 fu.kZ; fnukad 13-12-80 ls lEcfU/kr ,d rudh Hkh dk;e dh xbZ Fkh vkSj mi[k.M vf/kdkjh us vius fu.kZ; esa Jh ekaxhyky ,oa Jh nsoh yky ¼orZeku fuxjkuh esa izkFkhZ½ dks fooknxzLr Hkwfe ij fdlh izdkj ds gLr{ksi ugha djus ckcr LFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk tkjh dh FkhA ;g Hkh fufoZokn gS fd Jh nsoh yky dks ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 356 dh tkudkjh o"kZ 1986 esa gh gks xbZ Fkh D;ksafd muds }kjk fnukad 28-10-86 dks tokc izLrqr fd;k x;k Fkk ftlesa ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 356 dk Li"V mYys[k Fkk vkSj izkfFkZuh dLrwjh ckbZ us blh fu;fer okn esa vius c;ku ntZ djk;s Fks ftlesa mi[k.M vf/kdkjh ds le{k ;g Lohdkj fd;k x;k Fkk fd muds firk Jh dtksM dh e`R;q ds ckn bl Hkwfe ij Jh ?ku';ke tks Jh dtksM dk xksn iq= gS og dkfct gS rFkk dLrwjh ds firk dtksM us Jh ?ku';ke dks xksn fy;k Fkk xksnukesa dh jftLVªh Hkh djokbZ FkhA 11- mijksDr foospu mijkUr ;g fufoZokn :i ls izekf.kr gS fd izkFkhZx.k dks ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 356 dh tkudkjh o"kZ 1986 esa gh gks pqdh Fkh vkSj mUgksaus tku cw>dj 25 o"kZ ckn vfrfjDr ftyk dysDVj ds U;k;ky; esa vihy is'k dh tks fe;kn ds fcUnq ij gh [kkfjt ;ksX; FkhA blfy, fo}ku vfrfjDr lEHkkxh; vk;qDr dksVk ds bl er ls ge vius vki dks lger ikrs gS fd vfrfjDr ftyk dysDVj ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr vihy Li"V :i ls fe;kn ckgj FkhA 12- tSlk fd mij foospu fd;k tk pqdk gS i{kdkjksa ds vf/kdkjksa dk fuLrkj.k mi[k.M vf/kdkjh ds U;k;ky; esa fuf.kZr fu;fer okn esa gks pqdk gS fQj Hkh ge ;gka ;g mYys[k djuk mfpr le>rs gSa fd e`rd [kkrsnkj Jh dtksM dh fojklr ds izdj.k esa ukekUrdj.k la[;k 356 xzke uheksyk fnukad 13-12-80 dks iathd`r xksnukek fnukad 15-3-67 ds vk/kkj ij rLnhd fd;k x;k gS vkSj bl rF; dks izkFkhZx.k us mi[k.M vf/kdkjh dksVk ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fu;fer okn esa Lohdkj Hkh fd;k gSA 13- mijksDr foospu ds ifj.kkeLo:i fo}ku vfrfjDr lEHkkxh; vk;qDr dksVk }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; rF;ksa ds vuqdwy ,oa fof/klEer gksus ls mlesa fdlh izdkj ds gLr{ksi dh vko';drk izrhr ugha gksrh gS vkSj muds }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; iq"V fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA 14- mijksDr foospu] fo'ys"k.k ,oa fof/kd fLFkfr dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr ;g fuxjkuh [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA