JUDGMENT : Sofar service of quit notice on appellant is concerned, it is apparent on recordthat on behalf of the respondent, the original notice of Ex. P/1 was sent tothe appellant through registered post and the same was served on her, videacknowledgment due receipt, (Ex.P-2), having her thumb impression on it, Soservice of notice could not be doubted at this stage. Even otherwise in view ofthe provision of presumption enumerated under Section 114 (e) of the EvidenceAct, the courts below have not committed any error in holding that such noticehas been duly served on the appellant. In such premises, I have not found anycircumstance giving rise to any substantial question of law on this point.