Research › Search › Judgment
Rajasthan High Court · body
2010 DIGILAW 1103 (RAJ)
Shanti Devi v. Nandu Devi
2010-06-03
TARA CHAND SAHARAN
body2010
JUDGMENT lgkj.k] lnL;-&;g fuxjkuh jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e 1955-*½ dh /kkjk 230 ds varxZr mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] ulhjkckn ds vkns'k fnukad 12-11-2009 ¼97@2009½ ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd vizkfFkZ;k uUnwnsoh us ,d jktLo okn mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] ulhjkckn ds U;k;ky; ds le{k ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dh /kkjk 88 o 188 rFkk 136 jktLFkku Hkw jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1956 ds vUrxZr izLrqr djus ij izdj.k ntZ jftLVj gksdj rkjh[k isf'k;ka pyrh jghA mi[kaM vf/kdkjh us vius vkns'k fnukad 12-11-2009 }kjk izfroknhx.k@izkFkhZx.k dk tokcnkok cUn dj fn;kA mDr vkns'k ls O;fFkr gksdj ;g fuxjkuh izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 3- fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd izkFkhZ dk dFku gS fd izfroknhx.k@izkFkhZx.k dks i;kZIr volj fn;s fcuk gh fopkj.k U;k;ky; us tokcnkok cUn djus dk tks vkns'k fn;k gS] og U;k;ksfpr ugha gS rFkk bl vkns'k esa tokcnkok can djus dk dksbZ dkj.k Hkh ugha fn;k x;k gS] ftlls ;g vkns'k lqLi"V ,oa ldkj.k vkns'k dh Js.kh esa ugha vkrk gSA bl izdj.k esa fnukad 25-9-2009 dks izkFkhZ tfj;s vfHkHkk"kd mifLFkr gq, FksA izkFkhZ }kjk leLr nLrkost ,oa dkxtkr vfHkHkk"kd dks lkSai fn;s Fks rFkk mldks vk'oLr fd;k x;k Fkk fd tokcnkok rS;kj djokdj izLrqr dj fn;k tkosxkA ijUrq vfHkHkk"kd }kjk tokcnkok izLrqr ugha fd;k x;k] ftl ij fnukad 12-11-2009 dks U;k;ky; }kjk tokcnkok cUn dj fn;k] ftlls vfHkHkk"kd dh xyrh ls izkFkhZ viuk i{k izLrqr djus ls oafpr jg x;kA izkFkhZ fo/kok efgyk gS rFkk de i<+h-fy[kh ,oa dkuwu ls vufHkK gSA vr% fuxjkuh Lohdkj dj izfroknhx.k@izkFkhZx.k dks tokcnkok izLrqr djus dk volj iznku fd;k tk;sA 4- geus vfHkHkk"kd izkFkhZx.k dh cgl ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA 5- i{kdkjksa ds gd-gdwd rks vHkh ewy okn esa r; fd;s tkus 'ks"k gSA fdUrq izdj.k esa tokcnkok izLrqr djus dh izkjfEHkd voLFkk esa gh fopkjk/khu vkns'k ikfjr dj nsus ls i{kdkj viuk leqfpr i{k j[kus ds volj ls drbZ oafpr gks x;s gS] ftldk vuqdwy@izfrdwy vlj ewy nkos ij iM+us dh laHkkouk ls bUdkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA vfHkHkk"kd }kjk izkFkhZ dks vk'oLr fd;s tkus ds ckn Hkh] mlds }kjk tokcnkok is'k u fd;s tkus dh xyrh ds dkj.k gh U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 12-11-2009 dks tokcnkok cUn dj fn;k x;k gSA vr% vfHkHkk"kd dh xyrh ds dkj.k izkFkhZ viuk i{k j[kus ls oafpr jg x;k gSA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk dbZ izdj.kksa esa ;g O;Dr fd;k x;k gS fd xzkeh.k ifjos'k ds de i<+s-fy[ks] ftUgsa dkuwu dh ckjhfd;ksa dk Kku u gks] mu i{kdkjksa ds fy,] tc rd ;g izekf.kr ugha gks fd mudh tkucw>dj izdj.k dks nsjhuk djus dh ea'kk gS] U;k;ky;ksa dks lgkuqHkwfr-iwoZd fopkj dj dsoy ek= rduhdh vk/kkj ij ,slk fu.kZ; ikfjr ugha djuk pkfg,] ftlls i{kdkjksa ds fgrksa ij izfrdwy izHkko iM+rk gksA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk fuEukuqlkj m)fjr nks izdj.kksa esa Hkh ;gh Hkkouk izdV dh xbZ gSa& ,vkbZvkj 2002 lqizhe dksVZ 1201 "Civil P.C. (5 of 1908), O. 22, R. 9 - Limitation Act (36 of 1983), S. 5 - Abatement of appeal - Application for setting aside of - Condonation of delay - Appeal against decree passed in partition suit - Death of some of appellants during pendency - Abatement of appeal as no steps were taken for substitution of their heirs and L.Rs.
within time prescribed - Application to set-aside abatement - Condonation of delay - Appellants were rustic and illiterate families, different villages within different police stations- Nothing to show that delay was mala fide, intention or any dilatory tactics were adopted - delay liable to be condoned and abatement of appeal set aside." , -vkbZ-vkj- 1985 lqizhe dksVZ 606 "Abatement for failure to bring legal representatives of deceased respondent on record within time- Petitioners even though knew about death of respondent taking no steps to bring his LRs. on record for 6 years- Subsequent application for setting aside abatement- Held petitioners being persons from rural area application deserves to be allowed." mDr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa ,oa izkFkhZx.k dh fLFkfr ds en~nsutj gekjh lEefr esa U;k; fgr esa izkFkhZx.k@izfroknhx.k dks viuk tokcnkok izLrqr djus gsrq dksLV ij ,d vafre volj vkSj fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA vr% 2000@- #i;s ¼v{kjs nks gtkj #i;s ek=½ vnk fd;s tkus dh 'krZ ij tokcnkok is'k djus dk vafre volj nsrs gq, ;g fuxjkuh va'kr% Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] ulhjkckn }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 12-11-2009] ftlds }kjk mUgksaus izfroknhx.k@izkFkhZx.k dk tokcnkok cUn fd;k Fkk] dks fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA dksLV dh ;g jkf'k izfroknhx.k@izkFkhZx.k mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] ulhjkckn ds U;k;ky; esa vizkfFkZ;k dks izFke is'kh ij vnk djus dh 'krZ ij mlh fnu tokcnkok izLrqr djus dk dsoy ek= ,d volj iznku fd;k tkrk gSA 6- i=koyh fuf.kZr bUnzkt dh tkdj] ckn vko';d dk;Zokgh] izos'k vfHkys[kkxkj esa fHktokbZ tkosA 7- fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA[ 2010 DIGILAW 1103 (RAJ) · digilaw.ai ]