ORDER 1. The revisionist has filed this revision petition under sections 397/401 of CrPC seeking setting-aside of the impugned order dated 8.10.2010 passed by the learned trial Court in Sessions Trial Case No. 78/08 closing his right to produce defence evidence in the case. 2. Shri Vishal Mishra, learned Govt. Advocate, appearing on behalf of the respondent/State, accepts notice of this revision petition on behalf of the respondent/State. 3. Heard on this petition. 4. Mr. Atul Gupta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that the petitioner is facing trial for offence under section 302 and in alternative for offence under section 304B of IPC and in that case, according to him, the prosecution has already closed its evidence and statement of the petitioner/accused under section 313 of CrPC is already recorded. 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been denied right to produce his defence evidence in the trial vide impugned order. This submission is not disputed by the learned Govt. Advocate appearing on behalf of the State. 6. It is the first principle of criminal jurisprudence that every accused has right in law to produce his defence evidence which has to be considered by the trial Court for deciding the culpability of the accused for the offence for which he is facing trial. 7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons stated here in-above, this petition is allowed. Impugned order is set-aside. The trial Court is directed to permit the petitioner to produce oral and documentary evidence he desires to produce before it in his defence which may be considered while deciding the case finally.