R. Krishnan v. The Registrar General, High Court of Madras, Chennai
2010-03-31
T.RAJA
body2010
DigiLaw.ai
Judgment :- The petitioner, R. Krishnan has filed the petition under Order XII Rule 3 of the Appellate Side Rules of High Court, which came to be numbered as CMP.Nos.11737 and 11738/2005 in CRP.225/1951 and CRP.638/1950, wherein the petitioner has prayed for issuance of certified copies of: i. Judgment and Decretal Order passed. (a) in I.A.No.222 of 1950 in O.S.No.119 of 1950 by the District Munsif Court at Kancheepuram. (b) by the District Judge at Chengalpat in C.M.A.No.114 of 1950 dt.11.07.1950 (Impugned Orders) ii. Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition No.225 of 1951 iii. Counter filed by the respondent in Civil Revision Petition No.638 of 1950. iv. Counter filed by the respondents in C.R.P.No.225 of 1951. v. Judgment and Decretal Order passed by this Court in C.R.P.No.225 of 1951 dated 21.08.1957. In view of the prayer made by the petitioner, the Deputy Registrar (A.S), before whom the C.R.P. was presented, passed the following order in C.M.P.Nos.11737 and 11738 of 2005 in C.R.P.Nos.225/51 and C.R.P.No.638/1950 on 28.07.2005. "Mr.R.Krishnan party-in-person "Heard the petitioner and perused the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. The petitioner herein, who is a practising advocate, states that he subject matter of both the C.R.Ps is his ancestral property and he requires the documents sought for in these two petitions for the purpose of establishing his right in different forums." 2. Admittedly, the petitioner, R.Krishnan, has received the following judgment and decreetal order passed:- a) I.A.No.222 of 1950 in O.S.No.119 of 1950 by the District Munsif Court at Kancheepuram. b) C.M.A.No.14 of 1950 dated 11.07.1950 by the District Judge, Chingleput. c) I.A.No.206 of 1950 in C.M.A.No.14 of 1950 dated 12.04.1950 by the District Judge at Chingleput. But, the only grievance of the petitioner is that he has not received the copy of the memorandum of Civil Revision Petition in C.R.P.638 of 1950 and counter filed by the respondents in C.R.P.No.638 of 1950. He has also admitted that the judgment and decreetal order passed by this Court in C.R.P.No.638 of 1950 dated 21.08.1957 and affidavit and petition filed by the petitioner and counter filed by the respondents and Orders and Dcecree passed by this Court in C.M.P.No.4368 of 1950 in C.R.P.No.638 of 1950 were received by him. But, all endorsements, memos, documents, typed set of records, which are in the custody of the Court in C.R.P.No.638 of 1950 were not received by him. 3.
But, all endorsements, memos, documents, typed set of records, which are in the custody of the Court in C.R.P.No.638 of 1950 were not received by him. 3. In view of Order XII Rule 3 of the Appellate Side Rules, the respondent declined to consider the petitioners request seeking certified copies from the copies or true copies of document filed in the C.R.P. However, the petitioner, is also ready to receive these documents without being certified by the Registry. Therefore, the Registry is directed to issue the copies of documents, which were not received by the petitioner, on acknowledgement to indicate that the same has been issued to the petitioner from the Registry. The Registry is directed to furnish the documents sought for within a weeks time from today. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No Costs.